The First installment of this series was "Updates and Quickpost". Then, volume II, was "Echo Centauri". Followed by Volume III, "Centurion Ganadae".
There was a brief attempt to combine all future "Quickposting" with generalized pages. However, it's since been proven more efficient to dedicate entire areas, strictly for this type of rapid exchange .
SO, the following is posting: volume IV
Note: This page is still under construction...
When the Brady Bunch theme was created, The producers were seeking a manner of presenting the family. And they decided upon a square board featuring 9 separate boxes. And when choosing which family member would belong in their perspective area, it only made sense to put Mr. Brady at the bottom of the screen, whilst his wife, Carol, appeared two boxes above him. This is considered the most correct manners. In fact, most women arrange the pictures in their homes, such that, the woman appears on top, whilst the man is below her. Partially because, it would seem unfair to give top status toward men. This is another minor issue, but still worth mentioning.
"Recession" (another example of social inequity.) ----------------
the following article is under construction. A man was working steadily for 10 years. Then, in 1991, the economy began slowing. It was necessary for many corporations to downsize. And, There was no other employment available.
But, aside from the financial issues, an unexpected problem appeared. Since the job layoffs, this man faced a backlash from society. People began treating him like a 2nd class citizen, just because "He's not working". He suddenly became an outsider. And everyone looked at him, as if he was some kind of loser.
But, several months later, the economy began to pick-up again. And, this gentleman worked steadily for the next 16 years. But, then, the economy spiraled downward. once again, jobs began to close down. And, he found himself out-of-work.
Soon thereafter, people began looking down upon him. It's somewhat odd that everyone knows he's no longer employed. He vowed to keep it a secret, since that fateful time in 1991.
And, sadly, he can't even relax for those few moments he's given a break from labor.
Besides, it leads to wonder how everyone knows his business, anyway?
the lesser of Two Evils
Virtually Every man is faced against two differing types of women.
The 1st would be classified as "the demanding type". Here's a common example: whenever a man corresponds with a foreign girl, she immediately requests financial assistance from him. Now,, these are NOT dishonest scams by any accord. Rather instead, it's a standard aspect of relationships between American men & foreign women. As soon as they begin corresponding, he will begin sending money to her. But, it never stops. Now, you must remember: these women usually reside in 3rd-World Nations, where the annual earnings are literally 1/40 the average American pay-scale. In other words, the typical American worker might earn $40,000 dollars per year. While the equivalent worker in an underdeveloped country would only earn $ 1,000 U.S. dollars during the same year. But, despite this, the foreign woman still expects her American boyfriend to give nearly $100 dollars each week. Oddly, you'd assume these women would have a more rational attitude (Since her job only pays $ 10 dollars during the same time-frame). Oddly, women in 3rd-World Countries actually prove to be more demanding . Whereas, an American girlfriend might expect dining at a fancy restaurant, this only surmounts to a fraction of the foreign woman's expectations. Let's give a sense of how bad the problem is: He first begins helping her with a reasonable amount. But, over the course of time, she drains him of his entire life-savings (because of her). Eventually, it will affect his overall standard-of-living. Literally speaking: She'll knock him into a lower social-class. ---If you know any man who's married a foreign woman, he would be reluctant to reveal how much money he's given to her. Yet despite everything, the foreign women won't consider him generous, since they're predispositioned to believe Americans can afford to be wasteful with money. The above story represents one distinct example. . But, there are many additional cases (such as, wives who bully their husbands into working plenty of overtime). (or, teenage girls who expect too much from her poor boyfriend.. Not realizing that his summer job only pays enough for automobile maintenance.) (or, cases when a 21 year old male is forced into loneliness because he's not established in the workforce. This explains why teenage girls rarely date younger males. The same rule applies to women, in their early twenties. she would never date a male in his late teens. Mainly because, "she would wanna go places.... .....Lots of Places where he couldn't take her". It would require an older man who's more established with his profession.
OKAY, This overall picture represents the first group. We're looking at the type of woman who expects too much from a man. And, he usually ends up losing everything. And, his hard-earned money is quickly snuffed up by a shallow female.
but, aside from this, there's also another type of woman:
We're talking about theso-called "career-orientated" women. It's truly amazing how her entire identity centers upon this singular aspect..
Thus, if you're dating this type of woman, you've probably noticed this behavior, firsthand. Her entire personality is shaped by this repetitive theme. ......and she'll remind you of this fact, every fucking day. She constantly repeats it, over and over again. It's almost as if, she's tormenting you.
And, along with this title, she also dictates orders. (..especially if she works longer hours than you.) Somehow, she's entitled to "even the score" if her job is more demanding than his. (Whereas, obviously, men would not create such rules if the circumstances were reversed.)
This also develops into a full-blown anthem. the woman always declares that, she can take care of herself".
These images become ingrained into the female persona. The so-called "career woman' has been lifted to a magical status. And eventually, She might as well be wholly defined by this title. "hello, allow me to introduce myself. My name is Cindy Career woman".
And, whenever you spend time with her, she's never gonna ease up. We can hear her muttering the same words, over and over again" "I am woman. Hear me Roar" "Look at Me." "Woman-Power" " "never underestimate the power of a woman". "my fellow sisters".
So, with all said, .......the ultimate question is:
....which is the lesser of two-evils ??
.........Some choice, huh ?????
Explanation of Finances
(here's the simplified version of "Two Evils".)
Basically, there are two types of women. Those who constantly take, take, take. While others proudly require nothing from him. And, she repeats the message, again and again. Yup, She needs nothing, and this concept becomes her major battle hymn. "I don't have to depend on him, for anything". "I'm a strong woman, and I'll work the weekend double-shift just to prove a point". And, for the remainder of her lifetime, she will continue repeating this theme.
Now, let's get back to the old-fashioned type. This is evident in many underdeveloped countries. These women hold to a simple belief: "They actually think, that men are supposed to give money to women". So, just because you're a male, she expects financial compensation. It's truly incredible. She demands vastly more than basic necessities. Rather instead, you're supposed to support her reckless spending habits. And, by every literal sense of the word, she's a "Domestic Goddess".
An important point must be established. Most men are extremely generous. And, he is quite happy to share. But, the Domestic Goddess takes things too far. Just imagine a typical marriage in the early 1960's. *****Usually, the Woman's over-spending exceeded his income*****. More importantly, she rarely took these matters seriously. The wife would typically suggest that her husband should work a 2nd job. This is exactly how things were.
In many cases, the man was forced to work out-of-town, in order to support her spending habits. (within the continental United States) There are known cases where men relocated for Eleven consecutive months, without being with his children & family.
In order to give the best example, it's necessary to spotlight Foreign women. (you may ask why, but the reasons will become evident).
Some American Men became romantically involved with foreign ladies. And perhaps, the majority of cases saw unusually high expectations of him. We could give examples which are so outlandish, it would eclipse all others before it. Here's one typical case. A man begins corresponding with a Filipina woman. Currently, her father earns a mere $10 U.S. dollars per week, to support his children. You've heard that correctly. He's earning just 10 Dollars per 40-hours. SO, the American man assumes that his Filipina Sweetheart will be humble. But, he thought wrong. He first sends a generous amount for $150.oo U.S. dollars. But, incredibly, she's asking for more within Ten Days. So, he continues helping her. Until finally, 10 months later, he can no longer afford this high demand. But, nonetheless continues giving $60 dollars per week. One wonders why this woman would need several times the average weekly salary. (OR, what would ever make her think that someone could afford this absorbitant amount. MORE IMPORTANTLY: What makes her think, that any man should be obligated). Please be advised: These cases are typical. And, should by no means be considered unusual. In fact, some instances involve several years of extortion. We've managed to chat with quite a few victims involved with foreign ladies. And, they all share identical stories. For starters, their partners are less than physically attractive. Thus, eliminating the possibility of being Gold diggers. Rather instead, these demanding women all share one common factor: They're all old-fashioned, will usually being devoutly religious. You heard that correctly. Therefore, these women are not maneaters. Instead, they simply hold to old beliefs. And, amongst them: he's supposed to give alot of money to her. There are other stereotypes, as well. Also, in these traditional societies, perspective husbands are required to earn acceptance. So, she usually "Tests" him to see whether or not he's worthy. There are other off-topic issues, as well. But, in order to stay on track, let's observe factors involving personal finances. Basically, "Old fashioned" ladies have no concept of money, whatsoever. Their attitudes are totally unrealistic. She doesn't care how it's earned or where it comes from. And, this type of woman cannot be rationalized with. More notably, they are good, honest people. They don't go on spending sprees, nor does she fully enjoy material wealth. IN OTHER WORDS: THEY"RE NOT SMART WITH MONEY. This is one reason why she requires such large amounts. They're wasteful spenders. And, nothing is gained.
Basically, if an American Man gives thousands to a Foreign girlfriend, she'll have nothing to show for it.
Also, a traditional woman expects enormous sacrifices from him, even before they're fully committed. SO, for example: he continues giving, even before they've met personally Face to face. She has no right whatsoever to expect this from him, unless they're actually engaged. Now, one further note: plenty of these relationships result in marriage. And, while she remains with him, he continues helping the parents from her native land. SO, needless to say, this is common practice. However, it's vital to decipher key differences. Most women expect unreasonable support prior to romantic commitment.
Just remember: this is how women acted, during previous generations. They were not such wonderful creatures, as many believe.
Regarding the issue of "work", a large part of the overall debate has been missing. We've been told that, "men must learn to become more open-minded regarding these-modern-times". ....."and he should begin to accept these new changing roles, which redefine the genders.
Okay, with that said, here's a revolutionary idea::
You never stopped to consider: when Activists discuss the issue of "Women's Careers", They're trying to make us feel uncomfortable with the idea. Yes, that's the simple truth.
After all, why the hell should he care, if some lady spends her entire lifetime working away ??? We don't really give a damn, if she wants to sacrifice every minute of her free-time. Go on ahead ! Knock yourself out !
It's interesting how they try to intimidate men, only to insist that "he should be more accepting".
It's a total lie. They've turned the idea of "work' into a hyped-up issue. only to blame men for feeling uncomfortable. Why should these things become
SLOW HAND ----------------- There are many Social Issues which have gone largely ignored. And, here's one such example. Many couples seek advice from "Experts", on how to enhance their sexual relationship. And, occasionally, when the boyfriend asks a question, he's often given a crude response.
These "experts" actually give the most outlandish advice. Basically, if things don't work out, he could always "use his hand" instead. It's rather childish, to say the least.
And, by no means is this a recent problem. During the Dr. Ruth Westheimer radio show, in 1985, a male caller needed help with a personal issue. He worked an unusual schedule. Resulting in a broken marriage where he only spends time with his wife, on Sundays. And, amongst other things, their sex life was also confined to this time-frame. SO, Dr. Ruth advised the man to just keep using his hand instead of opting toward partnership. After giving her remark, the man asked Dr. Ruth if she was sure this was her final answer. And, once again, she told him to "use his hand".
So, this guy doesn't see enough of his wife. He consults with a leading Sex-therapist. And, she just tells him to go solo. Needless to say, this was a very irrational answer. But it indicates the overall lack of respect given to men.
For any boy living in the 1950's, he commonly faced jokes about "Going solo" because he's unable to attract a partner. While in contrast, these types of humiliating jokes were never directed against girls.
The Forgotten & destitute ----------------------------- Many people accept feminist theories as historical truth. However, this is a misleading concept. We should first consider, these issues deal primarily with the political spectrum. While aspects of daily life go completely ignored.
We should focus upon those issue which matter most. Aside from legal rhetoric: Most Social privileges for women are longstanding. It's very important to emphasize that fact. And here's one such example.....
Please read the following quotation. "[Poor men are] condemned to perpetual celibacy.
For of course it goes without saying that if a tramp finds no women at his own
level, those above--even a very little above--are as far out of his reach as
the moon...there is no doubt that women never, or hardly ever, condescend to
men who are much poorer than themselves."-- -----------------------------------
---- SO, with that said,
Basically, Poor men are thrown away by society. and left into the gutter.
And,, he alone experiences this level of destitute anguish.
you'd think the above remark was recently devised by a modern M.R.A. group. But, in fact, the great writer George Orwell wrote this back in 1933.
Now, here's the unedited quotation, in its entirety:
"[Beyond hunger] The second great evil of a tramp's life--it seems much
smaller at first sight, but it is a good second--is that he is entirely cut off
from contact with women. This point needs elaborating.
"Tramps are cut off from women, in the first place, because there
are very few women at their level of society. One might imagine that
among destitute people the sexes would be as equally balanced as elsewhere. But
it is not so; in fact, one can almost say that below a certain level society is
entirely male... at the [poverty] level men outnumber women by something like
ten to one.
"The cause is presumably that unemployment affects women less than men;
also that any presentable woman can, in the last resort, attach herself to some
man. The result, for a tramp, is that he is condemned to perpetual celibacy.
For of course it goes without saying that if a tramp finds no women at his own
level, those above--even a very little above--are as far out of his reach as
the moon...but there is no doubt that women never, or hardly ever, condescend
to men who are much poorer than themselves.
"A tramp, therefore, is a celibate from the moment when he takes to the
road. He is absolutely without hope of getting a wife, a mistress, or any kind
of woman except--very rarely, when he can raise a few shillings--a
prostitute...
"There is degradation worked in a man who knows that he is not even
considered fit for marriage. The sexual impulse, not to put it any higher, is a
fundamental impulse, and starvation of it can be almost as demoralizing as
physical hunger. The evil of poverty is not so much that it makes a man suffer
as that it rots him physically and spiritually. And there can be no doubt that
sexual starvation contributes to this rotting process. Cut off from the whole
race of women, a tramp feels himself degraded to the rank of a cripple or a
lunatic. No humiliation could do more damage to a man's self-respect."
It's chilling to read this type of material. And similar examples can easily be found.
A woman publicly embarrasses her ex-husband by saying, "well ....., he might have enjoyed the sex, but goodness knows, I didn't" The above remark sounds like something you would see on Youtube. But in truth, the early 1940's actress, Eva Gardner, made this statement.
Another remark bluntly stated that, "....Women rule the world through the bedroom". However, the above words came from an unlikely source. Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy, First lady of the United States from 1961 to 1963) actually made that remark.
So, Who says Feminine arrogance didn't exist back then ????
Here's An average girls' idea of humor: Let's emphasize the fact that most girls share this attitude, at least, for a short while during their adolescence.
the fourm reads as follows:
"When I was in 8th grade, some other girls and I had this contest to see who could kick the most boys in the nuts. You would get points for each boy, how many times you kicked him in a row, and how funny his reaction was. Another girl had to witness it so you could get the points."
"Sometimes
we'd do it with another girl. I remember a friend grabbed this boy who
was a couple years younger, and while she held his arms behind him, I
kicked him 8 times! It was hilarious because he peed his pants
afterward".
So did any other girls play a game or contest like this?
10 minutes ago
- 4 days left to answer.
Additional Details
For those that didn't, do you wish you would have?
THE RESPONSE FROM A MEN'S ACTIVIST. (coincidentally, a female M.R.A. named Diane commented on the forum)
Isn't that something to brag about...statistical
ly if you had been charged you would have increased the statistics for
male victims by a factor of EIGHT...how many did your friends ASSAULT?
Question: Girls, what do you think about TESTICLES? Created by: Da Facts iz at
06:49:03 PM, Thursday, March 25, 2004 PST
Comments
My boyfriend's
scrotum looks like a China man's chin, scraggly lumps of hair and all
wrinkly. How do males walk around, sit, and lay on their stomachs
without hurting themselves with all that "stuff" crowded between their
legs??? I'm sooo glad that I don't have testicles, they're fragile and
funny looking things!
Anonymous
I'm
a 12 year old girl and last summer I helped at a local gym. The manager
told another girl & me to go into the Men's showers to get towels.
After we were in there some men came back in, so we both hid in a
janitor closet. We could peek thru the door and see naked males walking
around. It was so funny, we could see their male things jiggling about
and the wrinkly testicles. It was so funny we had to hold each others
mouths shut. It was the fisrt time I saw a penis and testicles (other
than some pictures). It's better to be a girl and not have those silly
jiggly male things!
No Jiggly ThingsThe
male testicles are such silly looking things! Once on a dare from my
girfriends I kicked an annoying male between his legs, and he fell on
his side screaming in pain. His friends ran down the street yelling,
"She castrated him!" over and over. It was so funny, all my friends and
I watched and laughed.
Ball Kicker GirlsNuts, Nuts, and more Nuts!!!!
Nutty GalI
personally find it reassuring to know that men have a place of such
vulnerability.In a world where I am constantly getting obscene
suggestions made to me, and my breasts & legs ogled at by every man
who passes me, it's a comfort to know that those same legs that men
would love to get between can also be powerful weapons against the very
core of their masculinity.
The harrassment of women, and women's fear of men, could be stopped for
good by a simple lesson at school to all young teenagers: Simply line
up all the girls & boys facing each other, & let each girl kick
the boy opposite them in the groin, hard.The agony caused to each boy
would teach them to respect girls, & realise that they are not easy
prey.The girls would realise that they are not helpless against male
aggression, and that actually they have considerable power over them.
annaThey're useful if you know their real weakness...a place to store your mind controlling hormones....
http://www.copulins.freeservers.com
AmyThese Nuts, those Nuts, his Nuts -- I just love Nuts!!!!
Nutty GalRocky Mountain Oysters, Dude Eggs, Bullocks! I say good eatin' ya'll!
Cajun CrossThere is nothing in the world as ugly as a penis!
I hate men!Good
thinking Anna, that lesson might even be one in which the boys actually
learn something and since we give them a good kicking in everything
else at school why should their stupid balls be spared
Ordinary girlMy
husband has huge ones - the size of extra large eggs! They are in
proportion to the size of his c*ck. He is also a tall, very slender man
who has almost no upper body strength
LouiseSo Louise, your man is hung like a horse! I trust he is also as willing and obedient!!!
KarenYes,
he is willing and obedient. I wear the pants in our house. I tell him
so too. I lift his ego by saying that he wears the XXL-sized pouch,
super reinforced jockstrap (even if it is pink).
Lougood comment louise!
MarySounds like your man is all balls and no brains....sounds somewhat familiar to me Lou.
Toyahhe is all balls and no brains
Louisehe is all balls and no brains
Louisetoyah, what does your man look like?
LouiseCheck
out womanwin yahoo group.The greatest group I ever seen .Great job
about compiling information, articles , creative images ,fresh news and
others about female superiority . Society is surrounded by images and
signs of female e superiority- Woman are outperforming man
academically, socially, technologically , biologically and even
physically .We are witnessing the end of the battle of the sexes and
woman are winning on every battle front
Go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/womanwin/
I have to say that this group has probaly the best pictures about
female supremecy ive ever seen.Obviously the words make the real
difference to get the right mood.
AnonymousLike the stallion he is Louise
ToyahTesticles are good as you can kick,squeeze,slap and punch them.
Big BrendaSat. 2/3/07
Date Update#023 - Sun. 2/11/07
UpdateThey should be removed as soon as possible
Amy#0025 - (Mon.) 3/19/07
Updateballs are hot!
chelbballs
are the sign of women superiority.. anna is right.. all teenagers need
this type an education..
when i make my girlfriend angry, she catches me by the balls and i beg
her for mercy.. and she kicks my balls when she wants.. all women
should do thet when they want..
cagataykartal@hotmail.comBalls
are what makes males inferior to women. Girls need to be educated in
school this is a males weakness. Kicking a boy in his nuts is
acceptable.
LisaKicking a boy in his nuts is acceptable, that is true, because morality is a lie.
None of your beeswax.Morality
IS a lie.
Amy, there is no such thing as mind controlling sex hormones. If there
is show me a study, and I mean a reputable scientific study
Someone who does not existI'm
a guy with really big balls, and know first hand how weak and fragile
us males are compared to you girls. My balls belong to my girlfriend,
or like she likes to say. "Any of my friends". Once a big balled
arrogant male I'm now because of her, a big balled sissy, and I hate
having balls and being so weak and wish I could be girl without these
stupid balls.
girthtronkick her in the c*nt really hard, then.
anonymousJust glad I do not have them.
KellieALL MALES SHOULD BE CASTRATED.
KATHYMost
males hide as females in these polls. But balls is a male problem, as a
female, I do believe balls are the best thing that a woman does not
have.
KellieBalls are a males weekness and we ladies enjoy cause pain to them. I would love to castrate a man.
KATHYWhy.
If you force your man to lose his balls, you would have nothing to hold
squeeze, kick or cause pain. He would be almost equal to you, except
that castrated men live longer then women. Plus he still will have all
his pre castration strength, and will whip your ass for good, and you
will not be able to hurt his delicate balls, because you took away your
natural female advantage of having no testicles. LOL.
Kellietesticles
and penises are funny looking thgings! i wouldnt like to have all those
extra bits and pieces swingling about between my legs lol! i think they
would be in the way! i sometimes wonder how do guys sit on bicycle
seats without squashing their balls/dick? they are so easily damaged,
woudlnt that hurt a lot!
ball free!isnt it ironic, that the bits that make a man feel powerful (his balls + dick ) are really actually his greatest weaknesses!
lucyto
the person who said "kick ker in the c*nt really hard" id like to say,
you are obviosly a male! only someone with balls would think that would
hurt her as much as it hurts him! if a guy kicked a girl really hard
between her legs, it might hurt her abit, but then she would kick him
just as hard in his dangly wobbly bits and he would be nearly
paralysed! when it comes to being kicked in the groin, boys are the
weak ones, and girls are not because we lack all those sensitve parts!
stacyMy
point is that as girls we do not these sensitive parts. How we females
are lucky to be ball-less. But if men did not have them tesicles, we
would be at a disadvantage, so lets us always appreciate the fact that
men have balls, testicles, to our FEMALE advantage. And we are lucky to
be withour those hanging body parts.
Anonymousall
true medical science research shows that kicking a girl in the c*nt has
pretty much the effect if you kick hard, you stupid f*cks
mr. sir.#0043 - (Wed.) * 9/24/08
UpdateWhy do u all think there weird looking? I mean they look OK!
annoymousI
agree i like my husbsnds balls,he is extremly oversized down there,and
thats what turns me on!He have them in size of oranges i couldnt
believe when i have touch it for firts time through his pants!and his
major tool is over 15inch and 3.7inch thick-when we are on it and all
that is hanged on his incredibly muscular body.Kind of turns me on and
on-too much,jeeeeez!!!
amanda c.I love my BFs testicles...to bite them off and eat them. I hope I can castrate a lot of men this way
LindaMs. Linda Ma'am, with all due respect, you cannot eat his balls and have them too.
obedient husbandobedient husband I want to castrate him. That is what will happen, I am the boss. Castrate all men!
LindaThat is Your privilege Ma'am. Human males are livestock and may be treated in the same way.
obedient husband
Preface: It's important to emphasize a simple fact: Whether dealing with Media Bias, Legal issues, Congressional legislation, or, Courtroom Decisions, You can always expect the outcome to be favorable to the woman.
SO, it's not surprising when a Judge declares that Women's Studies are Legal & Non-discriminatory. -----------------------------------
Judge: Women's Studies at
Columbia Are Perfectly Legal
There's just no justice for dudes in this world: Last week a judge threw out a
lawsuit against Columbia University over the school's practice of offering
women’s studies, but no corresponding courses for men who want to study
themselves. Judge Lewis Kaplan followed
the recommendation of a magistrate judge and dismissed Roy Den Hollander's lawsuit,
rejecting his "central claim that feminism is a religion... Feminism is
no more a religion than physics, and at least the core of the complaint
therefore is frivolous." Of course, if you know your Den
Hollander, you know he's not about to let some treacherous, man-hating judge
get the last word. He tells
City Room, "The only thing frivolous and absurd is men looking for
justice in the courts of America. When it comes to men’s rights, judges
act with an arrogance of power, ignorance of the law, and fear of the
feminists."
Politics & Special Interest
----------------------------------------
When Men's Activists discuss various issues, our remarks are considered invalid since it can't be definitively proven.However, we could easily provide documentation to substantiate our claims.But, it's ludicrous to scrutinize every remark,whilst the MRA is supposed to handily provide all proof, as he speaks.
Now, here's one such example:----MRA's claim that most elected-officials are bias against men. There's a standard rule in Politics that demands an element of special-interest. Aside from any distinct issue,Legislators pander-to-women, as a whole. In short: it's considered Good Politics. But, despite this fact, MRA's are expected to provide proof. For starters: you could observe virtually any member of the Democratic Party, Whether it's: Bill Clinton, Barrack OBama, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Edward Kennedy, or, virtually anyone else, they all emphasize the female audience, to some degree. While many politicians treat "Women's Issues" as a top priority. Actually, this has nothing to do with any valid issue, but instead, they're appealing to an overall audience.
Back in 1988, Republican Presidential Nominee George H. Bush, made an encouraging statement, declaring that "women are the backbone of society". So, with that said, most Politicians, Democrat or Republican, are expected to follow this rule. Also note: there's a difference between appealing to the overall female population, and actually supporting Die-hard Extremist (Feminist) groups.
Now, you could visit the website of virtually any Politician, and expect to find some degree of emphasis toward women. Instead of an easy choice, such as Nancy Pelosi, let's try a lesser-known figure. While viewing the website of Senator Barbara Boxer, from California, the outcome was expected.
"* Women" This is One of Senator Barbara Boxer's top priorities in
the Senate has been improving the lives of women in America and around the
world."
Our Response: There's no reason to show preference for
any distinguished group. Even if it's seemingly harmless. Also, she
mentioned trying to influence the entire world. Democrats have
condemned America for trying to influence others. But, Activism
becomes an exception.
"The Senate's leading defender of a woman's right to choose,
Senator Boxer authored the Freedom of Choice Act of 2004 and helped
lead the floor fight for passage of the Freedom of Access to Clinic
Entrances Act. She is now leading efforts to stop extremists in
Congress from weakening a woman�s Constitutional right to choose.
Our Response: As usual, there are conflicting issues. They emphasize these privileges for women. Yet, at the same time, they often use the word "equality".
---Barbara Boxer also sent a letter to President Obama, telling hime that he must choose a woman for supreme court Justice. In fact, Senator Boxer is proud of her letter. Sens. Barbara Boxer of California, a Democrat, and Olympia Snowe of
Maine, a Republican, sent the following letter to President Obama
Monday.The President The White House Washington, DC 20500 (Dear Mr. President:) --------The announced retirement of United States Supreme Court Justice
David Souter an outstanding jurist has left you with the
crucial task of nominating someone for a lifetime appointment to our
nation;s highest bench.The most important thing is to nominate an exceptionally
well-qualified, intelligent person to replace Justice Souter and we are convinced that person should be a woman. -------Senator Barbara Boxer of CALIFORNIA.
OUR RESPONSE: aside from all else, also notice how her undertone suggests that women are the victims of injustice. And this supposedly explains why Feminist Propaganda should be actively pursued. There was also another factor which must be recognized. This letter was Firmly Promoted by CNN Political Ticker. One again proving that the News Media attempts to influence the outcome of Politics.
Also, in an unrelated issue, Senator Barbara Boxer champions a record for the Agricultural community.
Our response: there seems to be a "savior complex" that's sweeping her political party.
Nowadays, Politicians try to include every special-interest group. This now covers Black, Latina, Asian, Gay. Her website includes these, as well.
* African-American Issues: Senator Boxer is dedicated to
fighting discrimination and tearing down the barriers to equal opportunity. Asian-American Issues Asian-Americans have long been a
rich and vibrant part of California's history and culture. Civil Rights Great strides have been made to give every
American an equal opportunity to fulfill the American dream. Still, too often,
minorities face significant barriers to equal opportunity. Boxer has been a vocal advocate for policies to help give Latinos
OUR RESPONSE: this almost sounds like she's promoting the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950's. In any case, we should be weary of someone who's interested in taking strong action for a narrow goal. This whole Special Interest Mentality actually promotes discrimination. But, She used these issues for personal gain. She also goes on to include children, Veterans, Labor Unions, and Law Enforcement. Interestingly, WE included these groups before checking her website. Needless to say, she would not forget to expand her popularity. In any case, why didn't she just speak to everyone, instead of catagorizing each specific group ? In any case, there's a positive note: at least, it was more than a speech for women. 10 years earlier, the article would have been more exclusive to her gender. Plus, aside from all the hype, it's nothing more than meaningless words being used for political strategy.
She's also Chairperson of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (EPW)
Our Response: indeed, it's common for Activists to Mix [environmental issues] with Feminism. Please consider how such individuals are affected by their own personal bias. This rule doesn't necessarily apply to her. However, since we're on this subject, the issue should be addressed. Basically, anytime a Feminist works in a non-related field, her decisions will be affected by personal views. For Example: (this is a true story): A Feminist in employed at I.B.M. And, she then begins to promote a literary campaign celebrating the achievements of women. In another case: (this is also a true story) An extremist becomes a Social Worker. And she promptly educates the males on such issues as, 1) helping with household chores, 2) sexual harassment, and, 3) discrimination. Basically, when Activists enter ordinary professions, they propose a danger. And, assumably, this will be practiced on a wider scale. And, wherever they go, their influence will be felt. For example (OFF TOPIC) The next time you walk into the Smithsonian Institute, try to determine whether or not any Feminists are employed. Judging by the Pro-Woman artifacts, the answer is yes. This might sound silly, but, such Activists will assert their influence
This article is under construction:
It starts with a serious issue, right her in America. And, it's taken seriously for a while. Until eventually, the story loses its
First, CNN Launches news-breaking stories, claiming that Women everywhere are being raped in the hostile territories of Kenya. This turns out to be another profile of 3rd world nations. Supposedly, these crimes are common in that region. But, in the process, reporters are admitting that the problem is not serious, here in America. This is a long, dragged out game which the media has been playing for several decades. First, they claim that "rape" is an epidemic in this country. Then, the media reverts this story and states that it's a serious problem elsewhere (particularly in 3rd world African Nations). In short, Newspaper Subscribers are being Flim-Flammed by the media. Basically, they can't resist the opportunity to create serious issues. So, for example, Journalists declare that Domestic violence is a common problem. They also say that girls have a low self-esteem. And, most teenage girls are belittled by their boyfriends. And, so on, and so forth. But, in the process, people realize that it's highly exaggerated.
So, the media's next recourse is to take those same issues elsewhere, where it's more difficult to dispute. They can now discuss the issue of "domestic Violence", and its impact on the Women of Mexico.. This is taken seriously by most viewers, because it's not first-hand knowledge. While in contrast, when they discuss those same issues in America, it eventually becomes discredited.
In other words: First, there seems to be a , on a wide-scale. Then eventually, the story loses it's then it's claimed to happen elsewhere
In the May, 2008 edition of the Sweden Local. there was a heated discussion claiming that rape is a serious problem in their country. And, it's also not taken very seriously. that's an interesting combination, right ?
So, an entire year passed by, and a Mirror-image article appears on May 9, 0f 2009.
Now, back to the article which appeared One year earlier. Along with that story,
Society: 30 May 08 More Swedish
teenage girls than boys have had sex with someone of the same gender,
according to a new dissertation from the Sahlgrenska Academy in
Gothenburg
A misdirected US air strike has killed as many as 120 Afghans,
including dozens of women and children. The attack is the deadliest
such bombing involving civilian casualties so far in the eight years
since the US-led invasion of Afghanistan.
Families in two
villages in Farah province in western Afghanistan were digging for
bodies in the ruins of their mudbrick houses yesterday. "There were
women and children who were killed," said Jessica Barry, a Red Cross
spokeswoman. "It seemed they were trying to shelter in houses when they
were hit." Survivors said the number of dead would almost certainly to
rise as the search for bodies continued.
Kenyan activists urge women to ban sex to protest over stalled political reform
Campaigners call on wives of president and PM to join their cause
Move sparks debate in nation where discussing sex in public is typically taboo
updated 8:46 a.m. EDT, Thu April 30, 2009
By Faith Karimi CNN
Activists in the East African nation are urging women to withhold
sex for a week to protest the growing divide in Kenya's coalition
government.
"We are asking even sex workers to join the cause,
even if we have to pay them ourselves," said Patricia Nyaundi,
executive director of the Federation of Women Lawyers in Kenya.
The campaign was organized by G-10, an umbrella group for women's
organizations. It called on the wives of President Mwai Kibaki and
Prime Minister Raila Odinga to join the cause.
Odinga's wife, Ida, told CNN on Thursday that she supports the campaign "100 percent."
"I will not get into what my husband thinks," she said, chuckling, "but
I will say leaders need to focus on the things that affect our people,
and I hope the publicity from this campaign will raise awareness on
those issues. "
NAIROBI, Kenya (CNN) -- The fight for political reform in Kenya has moved into an unlikely venue -- the nation's bedrooms.
Plans are under way for women activists to meet with Kibaki and Odinga, according to Njogu.
CNN's Faith Karimi contributed to this report
"Another Woman's Group"
It's difficult to believe, but, many people still ignore the most fundamental issue. Basically, the mainstream media creates an overall environment which promotes special-interest. Therefore, it doesn't matter whether or not laws are favorable to women. Political factors are secondary.
Since women receive extra moral-support, this overshadows other factors. And as long as daily concerns focus upon women, nothing else matters.
She's given an ongoing a source of inspiration and encouragement. Plus, on a political level, there's an overall theme promoting "Women's Issues". The Phrase itself transcends any particular subject. And, it's become a Trademark by mainstream media.
---------- A new website has opened: It's called the
which is teaming up with:
Here's a classic example of campaigns which give a moral edge to women. We must regard these "Groups" as a distinct advantage in her daily life. Quite simply: Women are basically given the upper-hand.
It doesn't matter what discussions abound. The overall atmosphere clearly works to her favor.
Now, it just so happens: on their front-page, the mixed messages are quickly evident:
1)--- it's always female-centric.
"Women in Media: the value of Women's Stories and Perspectives".
--as usual, their themes are totally centered upon women. This has become a standard.
2)--- its dogmatic.
"WIP and WMC join forces to discuss the importance of women's voices" ---our response: what exactly are they saying? Are they suggesting that women's voices are unheard?
and 3) ---these groups are usually seen as a statement for equality. and, always justified:.
"launched in 2007 on International
Women's Day, a commemorative day that marks the centuries-old
struggle women have faced to participate in society on equal footing
with men. The WIP was created to balance the under-representation of
women"
---So, as usual, their goals are considered positive and necessary to achieve balance.
4--- it's usually misleading.
5--- There's a powerful identity given to women. For example, the headline, "Women in Media" or, "Women's Issues".
6--- The namesake is designed to be taken seriously. Thus, just by using a clever phrase, "The Woman's Media Center", these groups appear to be valid political organizations.
7-- the use of colorful logos somehow strengthens their cause. This same format can be witnessed again and again. Tomorrow will reveal similar examples.
------------- NOTE: the working title herein was "Feminization". Or, "Feminizing" for short. This term is used mainly to describe the byproduct of Women's Organizations. Their goals are strictly for her own benefit. And, the mainstream media participates in spreading the message. So, in a literal sense, the entire industry is being Feminized. (version 3)
The Following is an actual Letter which addressed a common issue of the day. This regards the manner in which boys were raised.
From Newspaper Archive.com
Walla Walla Union-Bulletin
Monday, August 9, 1971
Double Standard In The Pool?
DEAR ABBY: Some neighbors of ours have a swimming pool behind their
house. They also have a pair of 11-year-old twin boys and two
daughters, 9 and 13. These neighbors allow their boys to swim in the
nude at the same time their daughters use the pool, but the girls wear
swim suits. That's their business, but it presents a problem to us
because the twin boys have invited our son to swim in their pool.
Our son says swimming in the nude doesn't bother him, girls or no
girls. (Can this be true?) He also says that the neighbor boys were
raised to believe that it is okay for girls to see what boys look like,
but it is not okay for boys to see what girls look like. How do you
feel about this, Abby? And should we let our boy swim at the neighbors?
COLORADO READERS
DEAR READERS: Since your son already knows what boys look like, why
not? And I don't know why it’s any more “okay” for
girls to know what boys look like than for boys to know what girls look
like.
you'd think the above remark was recently devised by a modern M.R.A. group.
