There's one thing which must be noticed..... regarding virtually all videos dedicated toward 'Fathers Rights'. (as well as, Men's Rights) :
Unfortunately, they continuously reassert their support for Women's Rights. It's completely unnecessary to make that point, ......during a Men's Rights Conference.
Yet, sadly, most men try to remain neutral. Please consider the implications. Men are never able to fully establish their own identity.
Rather instead, he repeatedly offers agreement to her. This happens to be a form of repression. While, at the same time, complete blame is never placed upon the woman.
We're opposed to any type of Forced Competition
Men receive a great deal of criticism because we oppose forced competition between the genders. However, it's important to clarify the misconceptions. Men do not merely take a stand against women. In this case, ordinary women are attempting to operate fire-arms, merely because they've been programmed to compete against men. We are not staunchly opposed to any woman who honestly seeks this activity. There have always been a small percentage of women who enjoy recreational activities which are predominantly male. However, a woman should never venture into these realms, just to prove a point. ....And, that's the key to the issue. For example: it's not really a big deal, if a woman chooses to shoot a rifle. But, this should never be treated as an issue pitting men & women against one another.
Nor, should she ever try these activities, just for the sake of challenging men.
Notice how the above video was removed due to "terms of use violation". In other words, Youtube considered it to be insulting toward women. Yet, for decades, Women's Talk-Shows were protected by "The 1st Amendment". Protecting "free Speech".
Luckily, the Photo Snapshot gives you an idea of how the video transpired.
Building Friendships: Without me.
The next video is not necessarily controversial. However, the surrounding theories send a powerful message.
PROLOGUE: The following video represents a major form of social inequality Basically, the
media teaches girls to bond with one another.. Even though, it's an already longstanding issue. This added encouragement creates even more overall disparity.
But, the problems goes much deeper than that.. Common sense asks: ---Why would the media promote bondage amongst females?
-------Firstly, it's not their place to inhibit this activity. -------2nd- It's not professional, either. -------3rd- it's not fair. -------4th, and Most Important: [This was an already existing problem]. So, there's no reason to widen this gap between the genders.
If you've followed Women's Magazines for several decades, it's easy to notice that , many Journalists strive to reinforce stereotypes which already exist. So, for example: -----they give helpful advice to women experiencing troubles in her personal life, or relationships. -----They help mothers to establish stronger bonds with their children. -----They give medical advice. -----They offer tips on everyday living. And, most importantly, -----They help women to bond with one another. Now, please be reminded, these inequities already exist. and, they're constantly being strengthened, month after month. SO, basically, there's no reason to push things further than already existing... But, the systematic continues, day after day. It's truly never ending. Thus, girls are encouraged even more to formulate lasting friendships. Even though, too much attention is already directed toward her well-being. .
So, in the video below, During the Entire scene, these girls spent the entire time grooming each other.
We're talking about TOTAL INEQUALITY.
Disclaimer: the above video has no sexual connotations, whatsoever. It's purely an issue of social inequality, within inner circles. Now, with that said: The Video of "Grooming Girlfriends" clearly establishes unequal power. But, needless to say, each time strong evidence is presented there forth, the public reacts with several different answers. First, they deny it. Second, people claim that girls must rely upon each other, because boys lack those emotions.
Here's the answer: 1) don't deny something which you certainly realize it true. 2) Don't try to justify it. 3) It should be recognized as flat-out inequality. 4) No, girls don't have deeper emotions. Rather instead, males are not allowed to become affectionate. It's ironic how females complain because guys lack these abilities of human touch. But, in truth, the reluctance on his part is forced upon him. The average boyfriend is typically fearful of her erratic behavior. So, as a result, he stops displaying affection toward her. Then, ironically, females complain because she's lacking-of his Caress. Indeed, many ladies literally scare their partners into becoming distance. Only to insist that guys don't display enough holding and touching. 5) Interestingly, women prefer the type of guy who doesn't let his emotions show.
6) MOST IMPORTANTLY: IT just so happens, most guys display enough affection toward his girlfriend. And, girls are actually more likely to "groom" one another, when she temporarily doesn't have a partner.
(Disclaimer: this issue has no sexual connotations, whatsoever).
FOR EXAMPLE: in South East Asia, it's common for 18 year old girls to go out together on Friday evenings, while locking arms, almost as if they were boyfriend & girlfriend. Essentially, these girls embrace each other, as an alternative whenever she's not dating a guy. And, in this part of the World, many young women seek high-earning Foreign men. And, since she's likely to wait for this opportunity, she'll have no boyfriend for extended periods of time. Quite frankly, it's Goddamn scary, to witness dozens of Teenage Filipina Girls walking hand-in-hand. So, while there's no man available, they fill the void by clinging onto each other.
CONCLUSION: We're looking at MAJOR inequality.
(A brief reminder: this issue is not sexual, by any means whatsoever.)
Update:
It's quite interesting, we've been discussing the ridiculous "bondage" which takes place amongst girls. These theories must be correct. Three times, the above video was removed from the YouTube Archive. It was judged as possible "obscenity" by the automated crawlers. This suggests, our claims are 100% correct. This whole "friendship" thing is so "overly done". To the point where automatic crawlers are judging it as pornographic material. (just because, their manual expression is somewhat odd.) (yet, most girls "overdo" their friendship with one another.) It's a clear example of Social Inequality.
Another Forgotten Issue
Virtually every girl spends a great deal of time making-fun-of the male sex organs.
They taunt, and they tease, and they never let-up.
The story of virtually every boys' childhood memories.
(Google Search will return you to Top of this page).
