above Photograph: unknown author Ferry in Water --Photo from Bing Top picture: NASA
Back in the late 1970's, groups, such as Men's Rights: Social Awareness grew accustomed to acting alone with little public support. In retrospect, there were a small handful of groups at the time. The National Coalition for Men had already come to existence in 1977. But, groups, such as The national Center for men, and, The national Organization for men would not be formed until late into the next decade.
It's become standard practice for our website to produce fully original material, without outside help. Although, any literary contribution would be greatly appreciated, it's simply not common for citizens to become fully involved. The main reason is because most are busy with everyday hardships.
Long into the late 1990's, there was still support given to the Men's Movement. However, over the years, others have contributed to this cause.
And, this page is dedicated toward sharing their experiences.
(article B) There was a funny remark made by Chapin's Inferno (a.k.a. PineGrove33). He was asked to attend a 20th anniversary High-School reunion. And, a few friends encouraged him to go. In which case, he promptly replied: "Do you really wanna go back to meet all those girls, who thought they were Better than you?"
Oh, indeed, this is very true. While attending school, girls generally tend to regard themselves are a higher social-class. And, this attitude perpetuates from early development until adulthood.
(article C) Another great post came from a YouTube video, which is now defunct.
Here's how the video went: Two men were chatting with one another, while sitting at a park bench. And, Man # 1 says to Man #2: "....I was raped by my girlfriend again, last night".
and, Man #2 replies: "....Oh, what do you mean ????".
Then, Man #1 explains: "....Well, we were having sex last night, and, ...she kept going, even after I wanted to stop !!".
The video had a serious underlying message, challenging our beliefs regarding sexual-assault. Currently, any "Unwanted touch" can be legally identified as "Rape". But, if those rules worked both ways, similar interpretations could work against her, as well. And, one such example rests with the fact, that, women usually prefer prolonged sex. And, we could then apply the same ridiculous laws to label her "a rapist".
(article D) A fantastic incident took place in 1987, on the Morton Downey Jr. Show.
A combat Feminist was trying to prove that "all men are bad". It featured the usual remarks, claiming that, men cause wars, famine, disaster, and, tyranny.
But, Morton Downey stood his ground. And, with a burst of anger, he yelled: "They don't abort 15 million babies, every year !!!!".
The timely remark actually left the woman speechless. And, she did not offer a response.
(article E) Sydney Siller, former president of the National Organization for Men, made an interesting statement. When speaking about males who commit crimes, he clearly stated our position: "We think: they should be put-away". and, justice should be served.
Now, there's an interesting story behind that remark. During the 1980's, Women's Groups were constantly defending women who committed serious crimes (including murder). And, regrettably, N.O.W. often came to their defense.
So, for example: when a woman killed her infant, there was public outcry for her release. In a recent case prior to Mr. Siller's remark, a young woman had murdered her spouse. And, despite no allegations of abuse, people still asked her sentence to be commuted.
THIS is precisely what prompted Sydney Siller to make his position clear: If a man commits a serious crime, Men's Groups would never condone these actions. Thus, the offender should be punished.
It's interesting to note: Some Two decades later, ARGUS EYES made a famous video on YouTube, explaining that feminists hold women accountable for nothing. Interestingly, Mr. Argus-Eyes was completely unaware that Sydney Siller had addressed the exact same issue twenty years before.
And, although Argus provided a much more detailed discussion, it stands to prove the length of this crisis which spans several decades.
IN SIMPLE TERMS: -----during the 1980's, (then President of Nat'l Organization for Men) Sydney Siller noticed how Feminists readily excuse fellow women for brutal crimes. And, some two-decades later, Argus Eyes noticed how "N.O.W." publicly defended Andrea Yates, after she murdered her 5 children.
.....So, when looking at both examples, it stands to prove how things persists.
Photograph by Lucas Hirschegger
(article F) During the 1980's, Mel Feit had given us numerous quotes: An absolute favorite sounded something like this: "WE don't consider ourselves better than women. BUT the problem is: Women think they're superior to men.
That particular program took an interesting turn-of-events. However, before continuing, let's briefly discuss yet another example of inequality. Supposing you're a male living in this era. You're witness to an onslaught of Women's Talk shows & Magazines. But, if you dare suggest it's unfair, people will immediately bill you as "anti-woman". And, during the previous decade prior to Mr. Feit's remark, this group (MRSA) had noticed the tendency to unjustly label men.
So, during the episode when he made the remark explaining his positive outlook upon women, there was also a "feminazi" guest during the same episode. And, during her interview, she managed to call men "Genetic defects", as well as, "Intellectually retarded" and "slow learners".
But, amazingly, the audience attacked Mr. Feit, by asking him the question: "What have you got against women?".
That episode proved what MRSA had suspected all along: People tend to judge men as "being anti-woman" for no justified reason whatsoever. While, at the same time, Feminists who are deserving of fierce criticism rarely meet that fate. After-all, during the same program, a Men's Rights Activist professed his respect for women, while a staunch NOW supporter described men as "intellectual & genetic defects". But, the audience still regarded Mr. Feit as a bigot, yet failed to see any wrongdoing on her part.
PROOF: Men face sharp criticism for daring to question any wrongdoing.
Thus, the very 1st time you briefly mention anything, folks will respond by asking "What have you got against women". But, it's never deemed necessary to propose a reversed accusation.
(Article G) There was a memorable moment on Dick Masterson's Phone-lines. People are asked to call-in, and leave random comments. One caller made an interesting statement: "did you ever notice how every woman [claims] she's been raped ???
To which, Mr. Masterson responded: "Try this, sometime... Go to your girlfriend, and, ask her if she's ever been raped. ....and, watch what she'll do. she'll stop. pausssse for a moment. and, [she'll] think of a time which could be interpreted as rape. ---because [ultimately], the answer's (really) no".
Indeed, both remarks are correct. Under ordinary circumstances, females readily use these social-standards to their advantage. and, every questionable action could be defined as "Rape". SO, for example: if you had sexual relations with your girlfriend, she could easily claim that it was not officially agreed upon. Usually, when couples make sexual-contact, there's no verbal consensus. "It just happens".
More interestingly, these same outlandish rules don't apply to homosexuals.
Plus, when boys & girls begin a sexual relationship, (rather than him) the female usually makes the first move.
and, beyond this, broad definitions apply to various issues, such as spousal abuse, verbal degradation, and, physical abuse.
Finally, on a lighter scale, a woman will often accuse you of "being a chauvinist pig", even though, you've done nothing wrong.
SO, you could be perfectly respectful toward her, but she'll still accuse you of "being overly aggressive". and, out-of-nowhere, she'll demand that you stop trying to dominate her. It's amazing how ladies "stand up for themselves", despite little provocation whatsoever. Indeed, you can't even say a few words to her, without warranting a defensive remark: "stop telling me what-do-do".
It's all part of the same broadened attitudes. Women can loosely interpret any situation. and, she's given that right.
....Basically, This should be considered a privilege, for her sake.
Now, with that said, It's important to ask why she opts toward this direction.
In each case, she could've chosen a less cynical approach. But, instead, society teaches her to launch attacks against men.
Now, if every woman chose to avoid senseless confrontations, .it would offer a greater sense of humanity, in our daily lives. Thus, putting less unnecessary pressure upon men.
(Let's not discuss this issue too deeply.)
here's a separate issue, altogether: When couples quarrel, it's the man who usually shuns argument. Indeed, women are truly blessed with the ultimate privileged role.
(article H) On Youtube, the User "Factory 2590" has raised many serious issues. In one case, he asked the simple question: "(try to) Name one thing feminism has ever done for men!".
This statement was disputing any claims that "Women's Groups are helpful to society". It's quite disturbing how, so many people support feminism, despite repeated belligerence targeted against men.
So, why would anyone condone such obvious mistreatment? The reason is simply because feminist is typically described in a positive manner.
But, "Factory 2590" put those ideas to rest, by reminding everyone of a simple idea: Feminism has done nothing for men. and, under no circumstance would they ever defend men. Unless (of course), it stood to help their own self-image.
Now, in contrast, MEN ARE EXPECTED to remain open-minded. and, he's always being pressured to see things from her perspective. SO, here's another advantage, for her sake.
(article I)
The User, Thugtician, has also made several contributions (from Youtube).
In one case, he was talking about the mother of his child. And, in the process, she did not have a daily occupation. Which, she reminded him "How lucky he is, because she's not working". In which case, Thugtician replied: "You're not doing me any favors ! Go out and Find a Job !"
Indeed, every man deals with this typical nonsense, from women. Usually, when a child is born, the mother will spend extra time nurturing. And, the man is supposed to be thankful just because....
Now, quite frankly, it's really not fair. Why should women consider themselves the center of every lingering issue?
Whenever a young woman enters the Workforce, she actually thinks that it's supposed to be a big deal. Now, where exactly does she get these ideas from ??? The end result is purely a 100% advantage over her male counterpart. Yet, even for those who settle down, and raise a family, another cloud descends. The basic notion that he's forever into her debt, for whatever reason. Perhaps, he should consider himself thankful, because she's willing to date him. Or, he's lucky because they have a sexual relationship. He's even supposed to be grateful, if his wife expects him to work overtime, while she tends to the child.
Regardless of the circumstance: it's just not fair.
(article J) Through the years, Mensrightsmovement has been able to accurately classify routine patterns. And, amongst other examples, we judged the BBC as being overly consumed by Middle-Eastern affairs. In simpler terms: they really harp upon this particular issue, while leaving all else aside. .
This brings us to another contribution from Thugtician (who resides in The United Kingdom). He too, noticed how the British media focuses heavily upon Muslim interests. Thugtician's answer to this hype was swift and simple:
"They're asking us to help women in countries that we've never even heard of." (while completely ignoring the virtual enslavement of fathers, Here.
Indeed, that sums things up, perfectly.
article K
Sometimes, a brief moment can deliver a universal lasting message. One such example, is the time when a woman firmly confronted a feminist. And bluntly told her, "You're ruining the country".
Now, that remark describes things, perfectly. And, even though, mainstream media constantly praises feminism, there's more to the whole issue than mere noteworthy causes.
By all effects, Activists are destroying the value of life. It's really that simple. Unfortunatly, many people recognize feminism as a noble ideal. It's often seen as a positive accomplishment. But aside from the hype, they've taken away our innocence. It's almost as if, a giant cloud has descended upon us. Ever since the media has been tarnished with feminist propaganda, it's completely tarnished our everyday existence.
In simple terms: they've been trying to ruin our lives. Feminists are a malicious group. and, they wanna make everything difficult, for males.
He's always made to feel as though, somebody's breathing down his neck. And this is the part which is overlooked by the media. Beyond the political scope, feminists are trying to ruin our lives.
Here's a good example. During the late 1980's, a woman named Gloria Allred appeared on dozens of talk-shows. And, in each case, she encouraged audiences to chant feminist slogans. And, their united cheers produced deafening roars. The end result effectively overshadowed the male viewers.
Now, this is a true portrait of feminism. it's not about fairness, or seeking justice. Rather instead, there's an intangible factor. Women's-Groups captivate the audience. While establishing full control over daily affairs. But, on one particular day, a brave woman glared as Ms Allred and spoke the simple truth: "You're ruining the country".
.... It's really that simple.
article L.
On the Jackie Mason show, sometime around 1993, there was a group of "feminist" guests. And, they were causing trouble (as usual). It's funny how feminists always direct attention toward themselves. Regardless of the situation, they permanently remain in the spotlight.
And, this particular scene was no different. It looked identical to the rallies of countless previous times.
The program was comprised of Feminist speakers, supported by a hostile audience. While tormenting all those who dared to disagree. In this case, the topic asked whether or not women should be permitted into men's locker rooms. But, the particular issue really isn't important. It could have been (very well) something else instead. But, in this case, the feminists conducted themselves poorly. It was amongst the worst ever. During the debate, feminists actually used vulgar terms such as "go grab your balls''.
Now, with all that aside, One man stepped up to the occasion. and he spoke a powerful phrase: "Men are 2nd class citizens. .....there's ALWAYS somebody telling him how to think".
He couldn't have picked a better time to make that remark.
---the above article accurately describes routine malicious activity by feminists. So, with all considered, they shouldn't be looked upon, in a positive manner.
Plus, on a grander scale, ...briefly consider the quotation devised by the MRA. It hints toward a far reaching issue. (repeat) "men are 2nd class citizens. There's always somebody telling him how to think".
Every sector of the media displays a distinct level of bias. It's truly impossible to avoid feminist propaganda. Whether you're watching the evening news, or, browsing through the internet. In every case, there's a steady stream of female-centric activism. Which simply cannot be ignored or dismissed by anyone.
It's become a permanent fixture, affecting our daily lives. Women's Groups have become a constant reminder, for adult, and child alike. We're all required to follow this routine.
