Men's Rights Movement : Social Justice

MRM has been exploring the possibility of creating articles with Video, rather than print.   But, this is really nothing new.   During our first year in 1979 we were already experimenting with audio cassettes as a future means of presenting our information.   We're quite aware that most people prefer the easy-access of listening (or watching), rather than reading.    Unfortunately, no member of the group possessed advanced narrative skills.   But, MRM continued attempting to perfect audio presentations until 1994.   We literally compiled thousands of hours of audio track.   But, it was unreleased due to poor quality.   

    But, anyone can do their share in contributing to the movement.  Simply, use any material throughout this website for making your own Videos.  Then, post it on a network, such as Youtube or Dailymotion.  It's that simple.   You will find an abundance of issues, once you delve into the seemingly infinite pages or this website.  And, it's readily available, for the taken.     You might even prefer to add an original touch to the articles posted here.    Or, if you wish to recite the material verbatim,  then choose this option instead.    

SO, each and every reader can get involved.  

     Within the past several weeks, MRM has released videos dealing with the issue of Zionist extremism.   This caused an immediate backlash.   Now, if you read through the thousands of material throughout this website, there are no references whatsoever toward the issue.  However, this is mainly due to our reluctance to address this topic.   

     In all honesty, there's an extremist sect of Zionism more dangerous than radical Islam.   They're responsible for many wrongs in current society.   Ranging from Political Correctness, male bashing, radical feminism, and communism.    We should also include Media propaganda, and the corrupt Educational system; which had introduced the entire concept of degrading Caucasians.

     Essentially, MRM has been aware of this problem for quite some time.  IN fact, these claims are quite easy to research.   However, it's a taboo subject which might offend members of the Jewish faith.   

 (Yet, oddly enough, this rule never applies for the average American guy.   It's considered perfectly okay to mistreat specific groups of men, particular those of European descent.   Ironically, this goal was clearly spelled out by Social Marxists, in the 1920's.  Communists at the Frankfurt School introduced the idea of Critical Theory.   And these roots formulated the eventual practice of Journalists degrading White Men; in our daily newspapers.)  And, it just so happens that The Critique was devised by extremist Zionists.      

 strange as it may sound. 

                                       

     Currently, every major News program ignites racial hatred and strife.  So, they spread lies claiming that white people have racist attitudes.   For example:  Radio & Internet personalities, such as The Young Turks; are gaining popularity just by portraying "White People" as the bad guys.  SO, they try to substantiate these claims by siting alleged biases & double standards.   This produces a ripple effect which directs hatred against the targeted group.    Thus defeating the whole purpose.   Basically, The Young Turks are racial bigots.  If you browse through their material; they always side against Europeans.    But, at the same time; they remind their audience that 'white people are racist'.  

 (Section B)    Here's a few quick examples:    When Sarah Palin's teenage daughter became pregnant;  The Young Turks transformed the event into a racial issue.   How was this possible ?  The reason is supposedly because Journalists would have stereotyped a black teenage mother.    Now, even if those allegations were true; it's redundant to focus on racial issues so frequently. 

(Section C)   On another episode; they spoke about racial stereotypes in our daily language.  The term  "Soccer Mom"  is supposedly biased in favor of White People.    Meanwhile, a black woman is referred to as "Welfare Mother".     This is another example of cheesy, dumb-ass Journalism.   Once again, his claims are untrue.  But it's quite irrelevant anyhow.   The Young Turks; Cenk Uygur was comparing middle-classed women (aka Soccer Mom), with someone who's receiving public subsidies.   But, as usual; The Turks are fixated on this narrow issue: "racism".   

     In other words:  They're merely promoting this theme, in order to attract hordes of followers.   The Young Turks are popular to a world-wide audience.  Mainly because he portrays 'White Men" as the bad guy. 
 The Turks accuse Glenn Beck of racism; merely because Mr. Beck opposes many policies of President Obama.   Several other celebrities face similar accusations.   

    We browsed through one hundred video clips, from the Turks.  And, they followed a basic formula:  

(Section D)

     Their program is similar to a 1980's Woman's Talk-Show.  Back then, Woman's Groups had total authority over daytime television.  And, as a result; there was an entire lineup of Gynocentric programing.   It's too difficult to explain every detail;   but The Feminists were given the power to create any subject-matter they pleased.  And, this was carried out routinely.  
     Surprisingly, these Women's Talk-Shows spent enormous time promoting gender neutrality.   They often made such claims after being guilty of the exact same faults.   Thus, a simple pattern began to emerge.   She would first spend an entire segment focusing upon women.  Afterward;  reminding everyone that women are unfairly stereotyped.  
     The next day, each Woman's Talk-Show would repeat this same sequence.   In simple terms:  They'd make a lot of sexist remarks.   Only to claim that he's the Chauvinist pig.  
    Basically; these programs created their own virtual universe.  Even though everything revolved around women;  they could still convince everyone that the opposite was true.  Audiences were hypnotized into believing an overall storyline.   And, it transcended any sense of reality. 
(Section E)      --A Comparison Between Women's Talk-Shows and The Young Turks--.
                                              

 Women's Talk-Shows could create any scenario, day after day.  No one would question their narrative.  And, nothing could ever be done about it.  But unfortunately; these programs could justify their own presence.  Each time women made unfair remarks;  she could simply point the finger back at him. 
     It's pretty simple:   All discussions centered around her. Feminists could steer the program into any plausible direction.   Everything favored women.  Yet, men were portrayed at the antagonists, deserving of all blame.
     The same methods were applied to literature; scholastics; Journalism; and what-have-you.
(Secttion F)     --Using the Same old Techniques.--

     Now, The Young Turks are somewhat similar.   Their radio broadcast is nothing new.   They display typical bias against the same targeted group.   But, as always; they can steer things into any possible direction.  Cenk Uygur often makes unfair remarks. But, he also has the ability to reverse these accusations.  The entire media plays this simple game  White men are negatively stereotyped; while also being faulted.
   If you've watched the Young Turks in action;  you'd think  they were the first ones to ever criticize men..  But, after 40 years of Feminist media, it's all the same rhetoric.    The Young Turks are not breaking any new ground.  It's the old formula that's been used effectively since the inception of Bolshevism.   Two Words:  Critical Theory.
      There are countless similarities between every program that bashes white males.   But The Young Turks add new elements.  Just remember that much of his audience has never even traveled to the USA.  So, everyone gets their information from These amateurish Disk-Jockeys.   Foreigners presume that white men are toothless, racist, fat, ugly ogres.   But, it all makes perfect sense to the listeners.   Mainly because The Turks often use reverse-psychology.  They spread messages of peace & understanding toward others.  
    
(Section G)  Amongst other things, The Turks push for rapid immigration into The United States.   Interestingly, his native country of Turkey is  99.3% Muslim or non-believer.  While only a half of 1% Christian.   The Turks also blame the USA for past evils.  Once again, the History books should remind him of his own dark past.   (Such as, the modern world's first Genocide; and being the first to Veil women).   Cenk was born in Istanbul; a natural province of Greece dissolved into the Ottoman Empire. 

(Section h)   The Young Turks are typical sour Journalists.   Whenever presenting an issue; they fail to give any intellectual input.   Instead, Cenk resorts to making 4th grade humor.   And, he tries to make the other side look bad, rather than being educated.  For example:  He'll show footage of Bill O'Reilly losing his temper.   Or, a brief clip of Glenn Beck stuttering.   
     The entire media has been reduced to this type of smear campaign.   MRM wouldn't even waste our time with this matter.   But, these guys have received numerous awards for excellence.  How is this possible?   Primarily because every medium is controlled by extremists.   Cenk Uygur has even found his way to MSNBC.      

Take a look at This garbage.    He's got no journalism skills whatsoever.  He can't narrate.   Nor does he say anything skilled or educated.   Instead, he merely tries to make the other side look bad.   So, why did MSNBC hire this guy ? 

(The Lesson Learned)
    The USCIS should be careful as to who's allowed to migrate into our culture.  Because The Young Turks are an example of hatred brought to America.

     The Most Important Issue Facing Generations of Misguided Citizens

(4) ------
In short:  2nd Generation Communism is formerly known as Gradualism.  (a Term created by Seth Shannon).   But apparently, only a hundred people in the entire world even bothered to notice.   NextGen Communism is actually More dangerous than full scale revolutions.  By this time, they have a full grip over your viewpoint.   And, the younger generation is too young to have experienced firsthand contact.  Thus, you're only capable of believing whatever you've been taught.
 (in other words: NexGen Communism is more difficult to defeat.  They've won your support, often by promising utopia. and, rewriting past events. )
(Example: Most 21st century teenagers are indoctrinated to believe that everything carries negative stereotyping against African Americans and Women.  Yet, none of these people were alive during the 1970's; when the entire media was either Afrocentric or Femalecentric.   Indeed, most Journalists felt obligated to see matters through their perspective.   But, the Teenagers of today simply don't understand this.  Nor do they recognize that Feminists were also making thousands of Genocidal remarks against men.)

Now, with that said: let's review the latest topic: ......

                              Was this aided by Mainstream Media?
A monumental issue was directed to the attention of MRM, just a few days ago.   "Social  Engineers" are trying to force the entire continent of Europe to rapidly integrate.  But, after reading the material and watching footage; it seemed like more of a deliberate attempt to dilute their cultures. 

This raised a few questions: 
Most importantly-why wasn't this issue given priority in mainstream media?  
Answer:  The reason is because our media establishment hates everything European.  And, they've always been hostile toward Western Civilization in general. 

 ALSO: The media is too busy sharing insignificant stories surrounding Women.  
--"The ten best ways women can invest their money".
--"How women can manage their free time".
--"More and more women are relocating for their jobs".
--"there's a greater need for female employees during the recession".
--"The Top 100 websites friendly to women"
--"Single Mothers owning small businesses"..

This is how mainstream media stalls on the truly important issues.   By every literal sense of the word: "They're deliberately wasting our time".  So, while Europe is facing huge immigration from Islamic Countries, the Corrupt media decides to conceal this fact.   They'd rather share daily stories which promote some trivial message.
(2)
Now, with that said: ask yourself if there's some hidden animosity within mainstream media.  Let's not be paranoid; but it almost seems as though The Media is overridden with hostile individuals.  And, it seems obvious that they're trying to ruin society, as quickly as possible.  But, the younger generation is too young to remember the millions of insults against men; ...thrashed around during the 1970's.
There's a connection between Media hostilities during the 1970's, and their failing to revert the huge migrations of Muslims into Europe.  Do you remember the previous message?   Progressive Media is controlled by unfriendly troublemakers.  And, this is exactly why The Media ignored such as huge issue.  They could have easily reverted the problem during its early stage. 

....But, you will learn, both parties are one and the same.   You see, The American & European Media are operated by Journalists who support ideals such as "Social Engineering" and "Genetic reconstruction".   
(3)
   They're the exact same "Bunch" who thoroughly abused men during the 1970's and 1980's.    Only to lie to the younger generation about it.
In basic terms: journalists literally aim to mistreat men.  They want to destroy Europe.  And, they hate Western Civilization along with all its freedoms.     This might sound ridiculous:  but, whenever you visit an online newspaper; just do a little investigative work.  Chances are; this journalist belongs to a long list of organizations and groups which push an ideology.    This is no exaggeration.   This explains why their articles are so emotionally driven.  
Literally half of all journalists are nothing more than advocates, Activists, Social Engineers, Nutjobs, freaks,  and troublemakers.  And ultimately, they all have their own personal motives.  
The same issue can be made with regards to the immigration issue.  Mainstream Media deliberately ignored this story for an entire decade.  After which, the matter could no longer be kept secret. 
(4)
Then, mainstream media blindly supported all levels of immigration, without limit.  It seems rather strange that Journalists would take positions on issues, rather than covering the news objectively.   And, they felt that no cap whatsoever should be placed upon immigration.   Why on earth would they derive such a conclusion?    DO they really feel that no limits should be placed on immigration ?   LET'S REMEMBER; this was the very same media who ignored the issue for the previous decade.  So, their true intentions are being revealed.
IT ALSO EXPLAINS WHY they refused to take action while European Governments were conspiring against their own people.   Do you understand the implications?  
   The News Media was deliberately trying to destroy Europe,  by failing to act.  They've done much the same thing in The United States. 

Now that the "Cat's Out of the Bag";  many Journalist simply admit their plans ....since it's already too late to do anything about it. 
(5)
Yup, they've gone down that road before.   But, let's not forget the past 50 years.  Mainstream Media has launched many wars against society.  There are too many to list.  But, their onslaught against men certainly comes to mind.
Therefore, you cannot merely look at The Media's attempt to ruin Europe and USA, without going to its roots.
In the 1970's onward through the 1990's, men were being emotionally raped and stripped of every ounce of dignity.  And now, Mainstream media conspires to Ruin Europe as well?          
                                                                     END

The following link might help familiarize you:  link to videos  

     MRM received an angry letter from an African-American Gentleman.  He was offended by an article here  which claimed that Mainstream Media throughout the past several decades was Afro-Centric.  

     But the content was taken completely out-of-context.    Essentially, MRM was challenging the idea that various ethnic groups are negatively portrayed by The Media.  SO, as a response: we merely stated that such claims were false.   (Ironically, MRM is not opposed to racial advantages for the African American community).   But, let's not evade the issue.   Currently, the entire Media repeatedly says that Caucasians are guilty of racism, sexism, and every other guilt. Yet the very same Journalists who also claim bias from within.   And, that's where MRM totally disagrees.    Our Newspapers can't possibly have things both ways.  It's perfectly fine to show understanding toward the African-American community.  But, with that said;  Reporters simply have no reason to state otherwise.   

   IN simple terms:  MRM does not take opposition to Special Interest.   But, once this is done; Journalists can no longer claim that the media is biased against African Americans.     That's simple logic.  

   This information is not the least bit surprising.  Indeed, Republicans are not well-represented.  And, so many faithful conservatives admit that they could see why others are turned -off by Conservatism.

   The Democratic party is often better orchestrated.   For example, The 2008 Democratic Convention contained a lavish stage suitable for a futuristic theme park.  

   Meanwhile, faithful listeners of Hannity & Limbaugh usually agree with their position.   Yet, tend to disagree with their rude approach.  SO, in the end, Politics are no different than any other job.  All that really matters is how you present yourself.

(The issues matter very little.   It's more important to portray a positive image.)  

And, that's the face of American Politics.
   So, future Republicans must take this into consideration.  The 2008 primaries were determined by Barack Obama's ability to electrify his audiences.  Yet, few people knew his positions on the issues.

The Democrats have a completely different approach.  Their presentation gets an A+.   It's a well-packaged theme.   Even though Leftist policies never work, in the real world.   So, it's a dangerous game of Style vs. Substance.  The following video explains the issue of Iconography:  

The Workshop intends to raise her level of creativity, self-esteem, and leadership skills.  The 7th graders met with College Students & Professional Women.  Coordinator, Marcine Hum-Phrey claimed there's a decline in morale during this period in a girls life.    This is supposedly due to the negative impact of society, media, and peers. 

This gathering was designed to help girls in day-to-day activities, as well as long-term goals.  

Perhaps, more notably, was the article featured in the local newspaper, prior to the event.  It marked the 5th consecutive year, this story reached the headlines.  It's likely, the same News Story will appear in November of next year. 

     The Article also claimed that many women who receive cat calls are "fearful for their lives".  And, this allegedly rampart problem has affected our school-children more than any other age group.  Statistically, teenage girls are the most likely to face street harassment.  (It stands to prove how the media can build upon a simple idea; until it develops into a full-fledged news article).  

     It's also quite interesting how this type of outlandish material would earn the top spot on Yahoo's front-page news.   But, if you've studies previous efforts, from the nations most visited homepage.   In simple terms:  several ridiculous articles appear on this, as well as, other trusted News pages.  So, it's really nothing unusual.

     Now, it's interesting to learn that the article originated some 4 days earlier, in the life & leisure section of a pop magazine, called Salon.  It's author, Tracy Clark Flory considers herself to be writer who primarily covers feminism, pop culture, politics, and sex.  In other words, these articles are written by persons which a biased perspective.  Any you can certainly expect to see many articles relating to the topic of feminism.  By no means should this be considered valid journalism.  And, Yahoo News should not rely upon such sources.  

     This brings us to yet another important issue.   Where exactly does this information derive.  It just so happens, there's an advocacy group called Hollaback, who campaigns to bring awareness toward this matter.  So, who exactly is Hollaback, and, why should their word be trusted?  If you study into EVERY previous woman's issue, each was consistently promoted by mainstream media.  This goes without exception.  

     As with most cover-stories, the Media tries to substantiate their claims by directing their attention toward a "Woman's Group" who specializes in that particular field.   IN OTHER WORDS: Our most trusted Journalists rely upon hard-line feminists for their information.

     The co-founders of Hollaback, Emily May & Oraia Reid; are both general-purpose feminist.  (dedicated on behalf of gays, lesbians, and women's rights).  Ms May has received the 2008 Stonewall Woman's Award, and was selected as one of thirty 'women making history' by the Women's Media Center.  This obviously suggests a much broader effort geared toward helping women.  Groups (such as the Women's Media Center) certainly have an extremely bias objective.  And, it certainly has little to do with any specific. 

  And, in addition to this group, they've done precisely what countless feminists have during previous campaigns:     These women have launched several organizations, rather than merely sticking with one.  Others include:  Right Rides for Women's Safety, New Yorkers for Safe Transit.   This is comparable previous Women's Groups, who strive to create multiple namesakes.    

     MRM had the opportunity to visit New York City on several occasions.  We walked through each & every street, surmounting roughly 200 hours.  There was no evidence for Street Harassment whatsoever.  However, panhandling, venders, & solicitation-of-literature were apparent problems. 

    It's important to remember,that, each time Feminists launch campaigns, their efforts are quickly accepted by mainstream media.  The group, Hollaback, has already appeared on all major television programs, including Good Morning America, MSNBC, The Today Show, Fox, NPR News, & CNN Paula Zahn Show.  This merely indicates that, the most powerful News programs are too anxious to promote Women's Groups.  (You needn't be informed of their unfortunate recurring presence.  Surely, you've all witnessed this before,  from each of those listed news programs.  

November 8, 2010  New York Times   "Phone Apps Aim to Fight Harassment".

November 6, 2010  MSNBC                "Should Street harassment be Made against the law?"

November 1,2010  Jezebel (celebrety, sex, fashion for women)

                                                        "Can a City effectively Ban Catcalls?"

October 29, 2010  Gothamist              "Street Harassment Finally Gets City's Attention".

October 28, 2010  New York Post       "Lawmakers Probe street harassment of NYC Women".

October 28, 2010  Washington Post     "Lawmakers Probe Street Harassment of NYC Women".

October 28, 2010  Metro                     "City Talks Back to harassers"

    We're obviously dealing with a corrupt media with its priorities in the wrong place.  More importantly, this is ruthless treatment against our sons;who are endlessly forced to encounter these types of humiliating articles.  

    Aside from News Coverage & Advocacy, there's a more disturbing consequence to this story.  Ultimately, the Woman's Groups are pushing for legislation.  (ahh, did you really think it would stop here?)   It's not necessarily wrong to complain if you've suffered a negative past experience.  However, this organization seeks to involve Government Officials.  They held a meeting with a New York Council Committee. 

 Their case was heard by Julissa Ferreras, Chair of the Woman's Issues Committee.

     Hollaback has already successfully lobbied the MTA to distribute & post anti-harassment billboards.  And, they are currently attempting to mandate no harassment zone signs.

  (This is not the first time Women's Groups have pressured for invasive government mandates.  And, it won't be the last, either).

This is merely the latest example of various Women's Groups establishing influence over personal activity.   Thus constituting a much larger pattern of Feminist political authority.  In years past, little was done when Women's Groups implemented their rules throughout Media, Academics, and  Private Industry.    

   Since getting involved, The Association of Women in Sports Media has vowed to push for a Workplace Conduct Program involving all players from 32 teams.   This prompts a simple question:  what type of viewpoint did you expect from AWSM ?    They are a Women's Organization.  And historically, they take an immediate hard-line position on every issue.    Yet, despite their narrow-minded viewpoint, Women's Groups always receive full cooperation from Media Circles.

  Hopefully, this article brings awareness to a much broader issue.   Essentially, the Media has a stranglehold over our society. And they react to matters according to a predictable pattern of bias.    And, it's amazing how these events carried a guilty verdict, before anything was known.   And that's precisely how overzealous journalists conduct their subprofessional activity. 

     Upon reading various newspaper articles regarding this subject, we're taught to accept things purely at face value.   But, the public must learn to challenge these notions.

For example:   who is the Association of Women in Sports Media ?

  Are they a non-bias organization, or, would they be more likely to focus upon women?

  And, why were they contacted by the NFL regarding such matters?

   Is this trouble in the making ?

  AND, what exactly constitutes penalties for behavior which others find "offensive" ?

 Most importantly: 

       Why did The Media devote such lengthy time toward the incident concerning Ines Sainz?

       and, why did it develop into a political issue?

       Should there be an investigation launched into such trivial matter?

AND, did you notice how quickly Media Coverage became saturated with gender politics ?

     Regardless of the story, things always have a way of 'getting out-of-hand'.   

Also,  Was this the 1st time a mandated behavioral class was implemented?  Or  is this merely part of a much larger problem?   If people fail to take action against feminist policies, these groups will continuously extend their powers.

Don't forget:

  This article did not merely dominate the cover-pages of Sports programs.  But instead, it also became a top story in Entertainment weekly, Social blogging, News & Business, and Teen Magazines, as well.

 Perhaps, it's the Journalists themselves who should be "investigated" for improper conduct. 

  MRM was formed in 1979, by three founding members.   Others have since joined the cause, and two originators from 1979 remain active until this very day.