Many people have mentioned the supposed negative stereotypes from past centuries. These claims could easily be disputed. But, we'll save that for another article. Let's also put aside the simple fact, that, such events were many ages ago. Instead, let's take the issue at face value. We should first consider surrounding factors which are seemingly unrelated.
Firstly, back then, Every marginal crime warranted immediate capital punishment. From stealing bread, to forgery, or, simple denial to accept strict religious code.
One gentleman was burned alive, just because he believed there were undiscovered planets.
In another unusual case, a man was actually sentenced to death for writing biblical material in English rather than Latin.
One man was executed for daring to greet nobility, with a simple wave of his hand. While another man was executed by the same kingship for failure to give gesture.
Back in those days, an insubordinate male soldier was immediately branded for life. Or, dissected alive.
Also, the idea of military dissents being told to 'walk the plank' seems humorous today, but, surely, many a man had suffered a painful drowning death.
There was also a time when 15 different suspects were all executed, just to guarantee punishment to the singular individual who was guilty. .
Ages ago, virtually no one owned land. And, they were even confined to remain within a few square acres.
At one time, citizens were fined for failure to attend church. In fact, Catholicism was originally illegal here, in the U.S.A. Back then, most patriots were confined to forts, and could not roam freely. It was a very dangerous existence.
Now, if we go back just a few centuries, the entire way of life was completely different. In the 1860's, slavery was still practiced in many countries. There were no department stores or strip malls. Professional sports did not yet exist. American Football and Basketball hadn't even been invented yet. the N.F.L. would be a half century away. and, the Sport of Baseball had just recently been organized on an amateur level. There was no Hollywood film, or musical pop-idols..
Try to imagine lifestyles without important inventions such as electricity, fuel oil, street lamps, or phonographs. Back then, small children were expected to work long days, on farms, and it was normal to finish schooling by the 3rd grade. And, many conveniences, such as indoor plumbing did not exist.
In short: It was a different world. And, any alleged prejudices are fairly minor, by comparison. Thus:. Special interest groups eagerly try to exploit the issues, for their own advantage. .But.......nobody should be given this right.
.....and, Aside from all else, today's generation is not necessarily more enlightened than previous ones.
New Article:
Tampering with our Everyday Affairs Discussing the role which Activists play in our daily lives. Eventually leading toward the one issue which has literally destroyed relations between men & women.
But, when the media filled the airwaves with allegations of Sexual Harassment, this was just one in a series of attacks against men. SO, it was really part of a typical routine.
And, contrary to the Media's claims, there's really no distinct issues, or reasons.
Instead, there's a general standard which gives favorable position to the woman..
While, always targeting against men.
SO, before the media ever mentioned the term "sexual Harassment", they had been focusing upon some other woman's issue. And, after this hype eventually subsided, Another issue quickly took its place.
The media had always followed a standard guideline: Based solely upon an ongoing series of Women's Issues.
So, it doesn't matter which issue it pertains to. It's a Woman's media. And, they pander toward her best interest.
.... Then suddenly, from nowhere, the issue of sexual harassment arose. And, it immediately became a household word.
Below, the wrong link was accidentally displayed. Featuring an older version of Page 2 (disparity affects our daily lives). This problem has now been corrected, and the proper link is now in order.
On Our Yahoo Group, Great progress is being made.
The Group will Never be abandoned.
Since, there are two basic issues which warrant countless examples, the doors will always remain open. And, we will continue supporting the group.
Here's a recap of 18 separate examples of bias, in Media & Television
This website can be used in conjunction with other Men's Rights websites. We've stated many general issues which are based upon reality. There are other men's rights groups which collect weekly newspaper articles. While other websites are devoted strictly toward fathers rights.
We feel that our site was necessary. While many political men's sites already exist. The social aspect was not thoroughly reviewed.
continued.....
----------------------- ("Making the rules") --------------------
For instance: If you visit websites for Adult relationships, it's common for women to dictate rules. And, she's quite blunt to establish firm expectations. For example: The man must provide at least ten photographs, and, he must be a gold member, verified, and provide payments for all conversation. (for proof of these claims, simply visit any adult finder site) Interestingly, she's merely a silver member, as most women are. and, few ladies provide their photographs. some are married, yet she will not accept any man who's attached. Many reside in apartments, but require her partner to live in a single family establishment.
Okay, now here's the amazing part. Typically, when two people meet for a liaison, the woman will screen moans of extreme pleasure. While the man usually has trouble remaining aroused. SO, she's clearly receiving more overall fulfillment. ... that's really something......
And the stereotypes mentioned didn"t begin recently, either. It's just another longstanding example of social inequality. (ver. 1.01)
Habea Daria
Here's an unusual example of social inequity. (# 44,812) Strange as it may sound, On a routine basis, girls actually smile alot more often than boys. This persists into adulthood, as well. Essentially, this suggests that she's an overall happier person.
It gets even more interesting. Major Women's Groups actually listed this as a primary superior ability. SO, when listing 10 things which Girls to better than boys, # 4 states that "Girls Laugh Better than Boys". This is obviously a ridiculous idea. How could this possibly make someone better ????
More interestingly, it's strongly suggested that women are less happier nowadays. And, she smiles less frequently than previous generations. In other words, women from the 21st century are less complete than those from the 1950's era. And, this shouldn't be the least bit surprising. There was a time when a typical mother was self-employed. And, she didn't have to answer to a corporate employer, or, any higher authority.
But, in any case, it's interesting how women share most laughter amongst themselves. thus, being more complete. While males tend to be less happy, by comparison.
Top Gunner (example of social inequality #258)
In the typical relationship, it's considered humorous is the woman's wages exceed that of her partner. This is another senseless form of ridicule.
People throughout society will often generate alot of hype. And, you've probably witnessed something of this demeanor.
People actually tease & taunt him, for such meaningless reason. And, beyond the issue of prejudice, it should also be condemned as an attack against social hierarchy. After all, in this day and age, you're not supposed to laugh at those who earn less. But, as usual, gender seems to be the exception.
Here's a worst-case-scenario: A man raised in the countryside, marries a woman from the city. And, not surprisingly, she earns a significantly higher salary. And, whenever this couple is introduced, people actually call him 'the guy who earns only half the money his wife makes'.
This is typical sexism. And, once again, the male is burdened with unnecessary pressures.
But ultimately, similar attitudes would be considered unacceptable in most instances.
This next article picks up, where "Top Gunner" Left off.....
Social Climber
If you were a boy growing up in the 1940's, it was immediately noticeable that females generally refuse to date males from a social class lower than hers. This also held true during one's adolescence.
So, basically, the male would permanently remain in his given stature. But, more importantly, it sent a message in the dating arena. And, this is one reason why women are often thought to be "too good" for a man. This expression is Never used, in reversed-roles.
So, there's an overall message, vastly more important than money, or social class. It backlashes, and creates a precedent in the dating arena.
It's important to mention, This same attitude held true in previous centuries. And, it could be felt into the 1990's.
Each and every male at school realized that girls simply don't associate with lower social classes.
Expectations persist
So, if you're the time of man who can tolerate ridicule from society, you can finally marry a woman from a higher social class. Or, so you thought......
Even in the 21st Century, the standard still exists. Although she's willing to marry into another step below, she herself comes from the same humble beginnings. This it doesn't actually carry the same definition. Also, her earnings are often the byproduct of a Feminist market. So, for example: she may acquire several hundred thousand dollars annually, while writing for a woman's publication. (or, a similar occupation.)
Now, she's gonna marry a man from a lower income bracket. BUT, she still requires high earnings from her partner.
SO, she wouldn't exactly accept an engagement from a common man.
In fact, you could visit True.com, and search for women in a high income bracket. And, if nearly every case, she will NOT accept a middle class partner.
SO, let's now return to the original statement. If you're the type of man who isn't bothered by taunting, it could be nice to marry a woman who's required wealth. But, she's looking for a more worthy partner.
It's a terrible shame. We searched through thousands of profiles at Match.com. And, were only able to find 2 women earning six-figures, who didn't consider her partners earnings to be important.
SO, she will only marry a man with a good paying job. During which, we will spend his entire lifetime facing ridicule from society... Just because his wife is regarded as the bread-winner. It's amazing how the mainstream media uses such immature terminology.
And, admittedly, just as much taunting is likely to come from other men, as well as women. (version 1.3)
Variable protocols of household finance ------------------------------------------------
Let's suppose a man has very few possessions. And, he's lucky enough to marry a well-established woman. Despite everything, He will actually remain in a lower social bracket.
It might seem difficult to believe, that two people within the same household could be in different social classes.
But, there's a distinct reason for this:
The woman would not be likely to share her wealth with a man. So, even if a lower middle-classed male manages to marry an upper-class woman, he'll still remain within his original stature. Always wearing the same clothes, and receiving nothing from her.
This same practice also involves ordinary middle-class individuals: Supposing a man earned good money during his prime years, while his wife's salary was merely average.
If this man ever became disabled due to unexpected injuries, he wouldn't be able to rely upon his wife. Because, she would not allow him to access her money. In fact, many women choose to divorce their partners, if he experiences economic hardship.
Even though , the husband had always given financial liberties to her. Basically, when his earnings were amongst societies top 15%, she has allowed full access to his wealth. Shielded only by her own personal discretion.
But, a man would not be given this freedom if the situation was reversed.
This sheds new light to the "Wage Gap issue". Because, quite frankly,
Men openly share everything with their partners. Thus, even if his wages exceed hers by ten-thousand percent, He's certainly willing to pass this wealth onto her. ......and that's the bottom line.
Destruction of the inner soul
It's no exaggeration to say that Feminists are mentally abusive. They literally try to destroy your inner self. But this has the worst impact on adolescent males. He's faced against mobs of activists who jointly attack, from every direction. They wanna strip him of his identity, until all self-worth diminishes.
So, with this considered, please don't associate Women's Groups with righteous values.
Also, don't subject our youth to this type of overkill.
It's somewhat ironic how Social Services often decides what's in the best interest of our children.
"Turning a blind-eye" -------------------------------- Social Services advocates positive child-welfare.
Yet, not surprisingly, the most serious matters are left ignored. It seems, everyone grants immunity to Extremist Groups. ----Politicians often claim to be supporters of N.O.W., merely because of fear. This should be every reason to denounce such groups. No support should be given to Social-Groups who exert political influence.
The exemption rule always applies.
We could list various issues which produce similar results.
For example:
----Psychologists failed to recognize any negative impact.
----Also, social networks give leniency to Activists, who misuse their site.
----Newscasters give their unconditional support, to the worst extremists.
----School teachers accept everything imposed by advocates of "Women's Studies".
----Daycare workers don't become concerned when Activists knock at their door.
----Law enforcement allows protesters to frequently create a huge disturbance.
..........many additional examples could be given.... and it all leads to a simple conclusion: Lobbyists are never required to follow any guidelines. ------------------------------------- Changing the Overall Theme ----------------------------------
Society & Media gives their full support toward women. Yet, after doing go, People still claim that "nobody ever listens to her". It seems, no matter what, They'll always insist 'the woman's perspective is largely ignored'.
Someday, Men's Activists might be dealt with accordingly. It leads to ask, what would become of him?
Smokescreen ----------------- (version 2)
In a sense, men are not given equal dignity in everyday relations. Although, This has nothing to do with modern dogma. But instead, it directly links to society as a whole.
For one, there's an established idea that men pursue relationships, while the woman is generally disinterested. Also, when dating tips are given (either in books or, on the internet), there's a tendency criticize men, in general. Plus, he's also given advice on how to win her acceptance.
But, most women dispute this claim by saying that "she only seeks positive traits in a man". For one, it's said that, "every woman looks for a partner who's got confidence".
Therefore our claims of lesser dignity are thereby rendered completely false.
However, these positive remarks serve her own best interest, rather than his. In other words: she's just trying to make herself look good.
Here's a few typical remarks often heard: Perhaps, a woman states, that she "seek intelligence in a man," and, "he should also be confident".
These positive requests are good for her character.
Let's recall an example when a young, male political candidate was seeking office. And his physical appearance became an issue during the campaign. This prompted an angry response from women everywhere. They insist, "we're not concerned about a man's exterior looks!". "we're not interested in superficial things, you've gotta give women more credit than that". It's interesting how women considered that to be demeaning.
How dare someone say: women would vote for a guy, just because he's the most attractive candidate. But, of course, if the situation was reversed, this too would also seem demeaning to women.
Thus proving: whenever women claim to seek positive attributes in others, she's really helping herself.
In a few short words: It's a smokescreen.
"Feminist Paparazzi Spammer"
What are the roots of this website? It all started back in the 1970's. If you were a child from that generation, Feminist were a constant presence in everyone's daily life. And, these media-hounds remained vocal, until no end. No one was spared from this abuse, including our children.
It was an all-out smear campaign. Persisting day after day, for years-upon-years. They would not give you a moments rest. She was literally "in your face", without relent, 24/7. By every sense of the word, they were an organized Paparazzi.. Thus, it would be inaccurate to revere these women as heroes. Many claim, "women of that era dared to take a stand". But, their acts should be recognized as abuse. and, it was welcomed whole heartedly by every media institution. Extremist intertwined with mainstream literature. And they spammed every magazine & book of that era. In many ways, it was the byproduct of irresponsible parenting. Becoming acceptable in every venue, from teen magazines, to children's books. The most prestiged Medical-Journals & Science books were also tarnished. You had to be there, in order to describe its severity.
Yet, very few people noticed. We seemed to be a nation of Zombies, while Special Interest groups seized control of most literature during that era. You couldn't pick up a magazine during that decade, without being hammered with this imagery.
and, to say the least, it wasn't fair in the least bit.
------ It became an issue of basic indignity. Aside from any particular topic, a consistent pattern remained. boys from this generation were given a total lack of respect. It can't be measured by any statistics or tangible issues. But, the underlining goals were extremely biased. .......though few ever noticed.
"Women's Groups Gone Crazy"
During the 1980's, we attempted to keep track of all the different Women's Groups. But, after a while, this project was abandoned simply because there were too many to list. But, even then, the over-abundance was easily noticeable. To give a sense of how bad the problem was, there were several dozen groups dedicated specifically toward Women & Science. And, literally four times this amount promoting .the broader field of education.
In order to give an idea of just how bad the problem is, another website managed to list a large number Women's Groups. (researched by MensNet, in Shenorock, new york)
Here's just a small sample, of the many Women's Organizations established within this country:
.National Organization for Women,
National Women's Political Caucus, American Association of University
Women, Emily's List, Center for Women Policy Studies, Women's Way,
Women's Action Coalition, Women's College Coalition, Women's Lobby,
National Center for Women's Studies, Hollywood Women's Political
Commitee, Women's Campaign Fund, Legal Awareness for Women, Women's
Bar Association, The Women's Center, Catalyst, Women's Liberation
Center, Women for Economic Equality, Women USA, Woman Activist, Women
Against Violence Against Women, Women's Alliance to Gain Equality,
National Women's Forum, Women's Power Center, Women's Rights Project,
Women's Rights Association, Women's Rights Action Watch, Fund for the
Feminist Majority, Division for the Advancement of Women, National
Women's Party,
.......National Women's Law Center, Radical
Women, Feminist Legal Strategies Project, International League for
Women, Women's Funding Coalition, National Association of Women
Lawyers, National Congress of Women, Feminist Center for Human Growth
and Development, Feminist Collective, Feminist Forum, Feminist
Network, Center for Advanced Feminist Studies, Association of
Libertarian Feminists, Feminists Fighting Pornography, Feminists for
Life, Feminization of Power Campaign, Feminists Concerned for Better
Feminist Leadership, National Center for Women and Family Law, Equal
Rights for Women in Education, National Coalition for Women in
Defense, Commission on Justice for Women in Defense, Commission on
Justic for Women, Commission to Expose Oppose and Depose Patriarchy,
Commission on the Status and Role of Women,
.............Center for the Study of Women, American
Woman's Association, 9 to 5 National Association of Working Women,
Sisterhood, Women's Political Action League, Legal Advocates for
Women, Human Rights for Women, Center for Women in Government, Women
and Gender Research Institute, Feminist Liberation Association,
National Association of Women Judges, Lesbian Herstory Educational
Foundation, National Council of Women's Organizations,
and more...
too many to list...... women against pornography, Feminists against Pornography, Justice for jennifer, The Woman's Media Center, Women in Media and News. (should we continue listing more groups???)** Plus, we haven't yet listed those Women's institutions appointed by government agencies.
Please consider the implications. The Presence of such large numbers of groups indicates their controlling ambitions.
It also speaks for their overall mentality. In order to maintain hundreds of advocacy groups, this suggests malicious intentions, on their part.
And, the sheer overkill is beyond any rational necessity. Even for the staunchest activist, there's little justification to create such a multitude of activity.
Any psychologist should reach the obvious conclusion: Clearly, Women's groups intend to control our lives.
Also, their viewpoint is presented in an organized manner, which creates an illusion of higher validity.
"Male Children in the 3rd World"
Whenever debating women's issues, it eventually develops into a contest to prove who's the most oppressed. And, not surprisingly, they will mention "women from around the world".
Yet, all information comes strictly from the media.
One such example is when they claimed that 75% of all poor people are women. This is absolutely false. More interestingly, the statistics are often impossible to obtain. (when considering the percentage of poor households, as well as, the numbers of married couples residing in the same home). Therefore, it's impossible to derive this 75% statistic.
Now, with all aside, let's observe another standard expectation. Usually, in a poor nation, it's the son who volunteers to stay elsewhere. This helps to prevent overcrowding. For example, he might purchase a non-working vehicle.
...And, while his elder sister remains indoors during the evening, the male spends his nights sleeping outdoors in the vehicle.
Also, in poor, underdeveloped countries, parents perennially neglected to buy clothing for their sons. They could only afford this luxury for the daughters. It's also been said, Boys outgrow their cloths too quickly, etc. This allegedly helps families to survive and purchase more food.
Many argue that nudity is perfectly natural. and a more prudish culture couldn't possibly understand. So, Perhaps, it's not terribly oppressive.
......But evidentially contradicts claims made by Special-Interest groups.
Also, the numbers of males in orphanages is significantly higher. (rumored to be 60% or more). And, female caregivers are freely allowed to walk into the boys shower rooms. Once again: We're not suggesting this is terribly degrading. However, these facts contest claims proposed by Women's Groups.
And, not surprisingly, most countries host nearly the same exact percentage of homeless male-to-female ratio.
One interesting fact regards the issue of education. During the 1960's and 1970's, the U.N. launched a worldwide campaign to "educated girls". Yet, they failed to recognize that the illiteracy rate in males was nearly the same. The overall figures for both genders were quite high. But, in a sense , this is not such a terrible tragedy. Although we're taught to believe otherwise. And, western standards was not familiar to a cultures geared toward agriculture. but nonetheless, lack-of-schooling should've been treated like a general issue.
IN conclusion, we shouldn't ignore boys in the 3rd world, .............just because Women's Groups have launched awareness campaigns for girls.
"Please show concern for thy neighbor"
In the European Cultures, parental custody is given to the mother, by default. Yet, this is not recognized as an injustice.
Then, out of nowhere, the media expresses concern for impoverished women, ........in some remote country which nobody's even heard of.
Now, the above article (regarding boys in the 3rd world) points out the discrepancies.
However, this article looks at the simpler issue: Here, while fathers are being treated like slaves and criminals, the media has shown little interest whatsoever. But, as soon as they hear about supposed injustices against foreign women, Journalists suddenly want to become involved. And, most importantly, they begin surmounting an issue before learning any facts. In other words, an overzealous media steers toward whichever direction as so desired.
FOR EXAMPLE: when discussing matters in the 3rd world, they might claim that girls are primarily facing starvation. Or, there's more need to give medical attention for women. This also includes treatment for diseases. And, some journalist will travel to these nations, already pre-dispositioned toward the feminist perspective.
....in any case, why aren't they the least bit concerned with the guy who lives next door?
The following article is being presented in its original, uncensored form.
Note: please take caution when reading this next article. Because the material might be considered offensive to some.
"An unwritten Ladies Agreement"
The female gender portrays itself as being morally superior. In fact, even a married woman commonly treats her husband like an evil sinner. SO, with that said, you'd think that bisexual behavior would be non-existent amongst females. But, as we all know, such activity happens to be a serious problem.
One reason is because, this is encouraged by the media. But someday, people will realize that it's not the least bit in her best interest. Girls are taught to commit such activity with their girl friends. And, as a result, she's likely to develop mental troubles.
Please, be reminded of Today's Social Services, who often speak of the "best interest of our children". And, it's certainly not healthy teaching schoolgirls to engage in reckless homosexual activity.
IT will ultimately have a serious negative impact upon her emotional well-being. Could it be? girls are being raised into an unstable mental state.
But, with all aside. let's now ponder another issue.
Firstly, many Activists make the argument that most crimes are allegedly committed by men. However, there's more to the issue than meets the eye.
Historically, average males could face harsh accusations, such as sexual assault, along with the risk of severe penalties. But interestingly: we never hear about any cases of 'girl on girl' crimes. Never once, do we hear about a female being sexually harassed by another female. or, a gathering where some girl took another girl further than she wanted to go. Nor, does anyone tell her to 'just say no' to another girl's advances.
This more or less implies that there's an unwritten agreement amongst all females. They are not to bring criminal charges against one another for any reason whatsoever.
This applies to several different fields as well. (including theft, child abuse, assault & battery, or what-have-you).
In fact, there have been quite a few notorious cases when mothers kill their children. and, it's claimed to be related to an emotional stress disorder.
Opinions, Opinions -----------------------
Men's Groups are often accused of giving statements which are not supported by evidence. However, this same rule should apply to everyone. Literally half of all Journalists choose to promote Women's Themes. We're also confronted by magazines, Talk-shows and various programming. And, it's strictly based upon their own perspective. Nothing more, Nothing less. But unfortunately, their views are given mainstream acceptance. Simply because, it's widespread.
So, it's interesting how Men's Groups are attacked for devising our own issues. Even though, this has always been standard practice amongst common circles.
Let's also consider, virtually every issue raised by this site could be verified through the reader's personal experiences. So, this website depicts many social realities. Although, nothing is 100% verifiable.
In fact, many statistics are ever-changing. and, the percentages should not be given Status-Quo.
These truths on this website can be verified through common acceptance. Most privileges mentioned herein are openly welcomed by society. And, few men are offended by it.
We call attention to various issues, in order to challenge conventional wisdom. It's not the least bit important to erase these differentials.
But, there's a simple overall message: we shouldn't blindly accept mainstream opinions. For years, The Media has been telling us exactly what-to-think. While promoting extremist ideas. Yet, it was rarely criticized until a few M.R.A. groups formulated in recent years.
Just remember, Men's Activists truly say what they believe is correct. While, Women's Groups are strictly concerned with their own best interests. It seems, this is the very reason why Feminists create so many issues. It promotes advocacy for women. While M.R.A.'s would prefer to avoid confrontation. He's not interested in "stacking" a treasure cove of literary books. Thus, his ideas should be considered more valid, than hers. Clearly, Women's Groups saturate the media with every imaginable topic.
Speaking of generalized opinions. Women create slogans, anthems, quotations, bumper stickers, banners, and what-have-you. And, people consider her words to be validated evidence. Afterall, since it's commonplace, she's always given mainstream recognition.
But, it's still meaningless. And, the slogan(to the left) is still quite popular. Many women consider this to be an anthem. Yet, no one accuses them of making senseless generalizations.
And, once again, females are given reason to feel inspired. While males are denied this type of encouragement.
Typically, when Acticists write literature, the entire book is usually based upon one simple phrase. In contrast, Men's Rights sites (such as this), offer a wide range of information. (1)--- This suggests that Women's Groups are trying to cluster our bookshelves with as much literature as possible. They often write entire books which are merely notihng more than a few simple ideas.
(2)--- Secondly, they're trying to generate substantial profit.
(3)--- And thirdly: the material is based upon their own personal opinions. Nothing more, nothing less. And, these ideas shouldn't be validated merely because it's promoted on a widescale basis.
This so-called "Beauty Myth" should not be considered factual. But, instead, the product of one's personal viewpoint.
(4)--- Also, there's nothing wrong with someone trying to look their best. This shouldn't be considered degrading, by any means.
(5)--- Men place high emphasis upon his physical appearence, as well. Ironically, women seem to be more selective and judgmental than her male counterpart.
(6)--- Such literature represents a distinct bond shared amongst women. In other words, it's a Privilege to receive this type of special treatment.
(7)--- Thousands of books are devoted toward women, for general reasons. Therefore, we shouldn't pay attention to any specific message.
(8)--- Roughly 3/4 of all males have seriously injured themselves as a result of strenuous exercising. It's a natural aspect of humanity to emphasize our physical appearance. By no means does this specifically afflict women.
(9)--- In many cultures, females rarely buy fancy clothing, jewelry or cosmetics. But, in Western Civilization, this is done strictly by personal choice. And, no one should deny them the option of self-improvement.
(10) --- Generally, we're expected to agree with her ideas , whatever theories they may be, most will accept them unconditionally.
(11)--- Women's books tend to contradict one another. Some literary works claim that 25 million American Woman have Anorexia, while other sources clearly state that very few women are thin. (such as the picture on the left)
(12) Anorexia is caused by human obsession. And, it has little to do with social pressures. In simpler terms, humans tend have addictive behavior. SO, if a female begins dieting, she may become compelled to succeed. This clearly has nothing to do with social prejudice. Please remember that males are more likely to succum to physical over-exertion.
(13) Many males have suffered from Anorexia. This includes men who were previously heavy. And, began dieting until they no longer kept their appetite. Anorexia has alot to do with bodily function.
(14) Most importantly, it doesn't matter whether a woman is heavy or thin. both are equally admired by society. So, in many cases, extra weight is considered to be attractive. In either case, society tends to be tactful toward her, but certainly not judgmental.
Back during the early 20th century, women tended to be heavier than today.
The facts
Men's Activists are often accused of "over-speculating".
But there are many obvious facts. Clearly, there are thousands of books written specifically for women. Plus, it's impossible to tabulate the unpublished literature..
Sometimes, there are full-fledged encyclopedias & dictionaries for women.
Fact 2: there's an abundance of imagery which promotes dogma. & an overall sense of belonging.
fact 3: a great deal of material offers more than verbal encouragement. It legally discriminates against men.
these are just a few examples. We could also include other subjects, Some are good: such as ---celebrating the feminine goddess within every woman. ---positive depictions of normal, everyday ladies. ---"Friendship Slogans" on social network which particularly target a female audience. Plus, there's also the negative side, such as: 'anti-male' slogans, and "Lesbian lust" (for future reference)
A long time ago, MensRightsMovement listed a brief list of recent news. Since then, we've opened an entire page dedicated to recent updates. But, the following information will be saved just to show how far we've come since first posting additions to this site.
the first list of recent news
March 17, 2009.
We're working on a few projects which are currently hidden from the menu, until more progress is made.....
Page 2, "Disparity" is still not finished after several months. But, it's not abandoned either.
Hoping to finish it soon. It was transferred from Myspace, to Blogspot, and finally to this website. Page 1, case of reasoning, is completed.
ALSO, the Youtube Playlist problem has been recognized. Several months ago, if a video was removed from the playlist, they would simply skip to the next video. However, now, the entire playlist is broken, if one video falls out of place. So, we've checked most lists and removed the dead links..
Still building This page. Work has already begun.
Also, "Advanced Psychology" ......will One-day be added in the future on a separate Page..
On February 7, many of the video errors have now been fixed On march 6, some videos are still disabled by You tube. This will probably become a common issue...
Significant changes were also made on the FAQ page.
Also, The First 8 Pages were all fixed. There were many photographs crammed together. So, they've been thoroughly changed, for easier viewing.
There are still issues with the distorded punctuations on pages 1 and 2. Apparently, each site uses its own commas, quotations, and semicolons. SO, one day, we'll solve this minor inconvenience.
On Friday, February 13, 2009, we're trying to finish two difficult articles: Qeaumonts Theory & "Women's Studies should be removed from School". Thus far, only a 1st draft was given. not finished, yet.
Right now, We're backed up for several months. SO, we're busy with many projects relating to this site. Eventually, all our efforts will be directed toward "Advanced Psychology".
So, there's a great deal which needs to be done.
We finally added RSS Feeds on the Game Codes Blogs. And, You can also become a "FOLLOWER" to the game code links.
Usually, we omit that feature. But, they're now included in the Gaming Blogs.
There's also a feed to "earlier versions" of Pages 1 and 2. But, only within the main articles.
We're also trying to start a new Quickpost page, as well. Right Here.
Other news regarding this website:
There's no 100% accurate statistic on the # of visitors to this site.
The Click counters feature several 'markers'. Recording various stages of development.
(this explains different counters for multiple locales. Although, most pages have no counters.) It's our preference not to include counters, because they seem somewhat tacky. (Most Prestigious websites, such as Worldly News Headliners, avoid these features.)
On this site, we originally had a standard device which records incoming traffic. And, targets repeat visits, and their location, etc. But, this software was quickly removed. Keeping true to our policy. And, that's how it will remain. (Despite the benefits which could've been somewhat useful).
Also, Quick Posting seems to conform with the average reader's interests.. SO, needless to say, this efficient idea will continue being supported.
In the distant future, the material this site will become 100% self-sufficient.
Currently, many photographs in our collogue are linked to outside sources. The same is true regarding our videos. We considered it honest and fair to link to the source. However, many sites are quite unreliable. Videos * Photographs are often deleted, or made private. Thus causing a great deal of work for this site. And, we don't catch these problems quickly enough. But, rest be sure, all material is currently in our possession. and, one day, all photos & videos will eventually be directly linked.
Thus allowing any problems to quickly be corrected.
Also, from now on, posting will contain larger letters.
It's unfortunate, we must promote this site. My preference is to devote all efforts toward the artistic aspect. And, trying to draw traffic diminishes that achievement.
Plus, this website has been receiving a huge make-over. But, it's come at the cost of less posting. Hopefully, we'll be on track, soon. It helps when others support our site by any measures. Whether donating, or, even signing our guestbook, commenting on articles, and participating in forums.
Also, there are slight Graphics Errors while We're building a webpage. This explains why the "bird-wings" sometimes remain motionless. There are other glitches caused when we're logged into this web-builder.
So, it's Not your imagination, ... if slight abnormalities occur.
